Skip to main content

Genetic association of ANGPT2 with primary open-angle glaucoma

Abstract

Background

To determine the association of the ANGPT2 gene with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in Chinese.

Methods

Six single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ANGPT2 (rs2515487, rs2922869, rs13255574, rs4455855, rs13269021, and rs11775442) were genotyped in a total of 2601 study subjects from two cohorts. One is a Hong Kong Chinese cohort of 484 high tension glaucoma (HTG) and 537 normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients, and 496 non-glaucoma control subjects. Another cohort is a Shantou Chinese cohort of 403 HTG and 135 NTG patients, and 543 non-glaucoma control subjects. Subgroup analysis by sex was conducted. Outcomes from different cohorts were combined for meta-analysis.

Results

The association of SNP rs11775442 with NTG in the Hong Kong cohort [P = 0.0498, OR = 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00–1.55] after adjusting for age and sex did not reach statistical significance after Bonferroni correction. Other SNPs were not significantly associated with NTG, HTG and POAG in individual cohort or in the combined analyses (P > 0.05). In the subgroup analysis by sex, SNP rs13269021 in the Shantou cohort, but not in the Hong Kong cohort, was significantly associated with NTG in males (P = 0.0081, OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.14–2.43) but not in females (P = 0.874). In the combined analyses by sex, no SNPs were significantly associated with NTG, HTG and POAG.

Conclusions

In the subgroup analysis by sex, a significant association was shown in SNP rs13269021 with NTG in Shantou males, but not in Hong Kong males. Further studies are needed to verify the association between ANGPT2 locus (rs13269021) and NTG in Chinese males.

Background

Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide [1]. In 2010, glaucoma caused 2.1 million (6.5%) out of a total 32.4 million blindness globally [2]. Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is the most common type of glaucoma. According to the highest detected intraocular pressure (IOP), POAG can be classified into high tension POAG (IOP > 21 mmHg) and normal tension POAG (IOP ≤ 21 mmHg).

POAG is a multifactorial progressive optic neuropathy. Both genetic and environmental factors are related to the etiology of POAG. Until now, four genes have been reported to be causative or probably causative of POAG: myocilin (MYOC, also called GLC1A) [3, 4], optineurin (OPTN, also called GLC1E) [5, 6], neurotrophin 4 (NTF4) [7, 8] and tank-binding kinase 1 (TBK1, also called GLC1P) [9,10,11].

IOP is a major risk factor for POAG and lowering IOP is currently the only intervention that has been proven to be able to delay the progression of glaucoma in human [12, 13]. Trabecular meshwork/Schlemm’s canal (TM/SC) conventional aqueous humor (AH) outflow pathway plays a key role in the regulation of IOP [14]. Previous studies found that the SC tissues show features of lymphatic vessels including expressing lymphatic regulator PROX1, lymphangiogenic growth factor VEGF-C and its receptor VEGFR-3, suggesting lymphangiogenesis induction could be developed as a novel treatment of glaucoma [15,16,17,18]. Tie receptors and their angiopoietin (Angpt) ligands are key regulators of vascular morphogenesis and homeostasis [19]. There are six members in the Tie-Angpt system: TIE1, TIE2, ANGPT1, ANGPT2, ANGPT3 and ANGPT4. ANGPT2 acts as an agonist and an antagonist to TIE2 in a context-dependent manner [20]. Deletion of Angpt1/Angpt2 or Tie2 in adult mice severely impaired SC integrity and transcytosis, leading to hallmarks of POAG including elevated IOP, retinal neuron damages, and impairment of retinal ganglion cell functions [21]. A POAG genome-wide meta-analysis in 2021 identified the association between an intronic variant rs2515437 in ANGPT2 and POAG [22]. Another ANGPT2 SNP, rs76020419, has been reported to be associated with IOP [23, 24]. Therefore, we hypothesize that ANGPT2 is a potential gene associated with POAG. However, both rs2515437 and rs76020419 are monomorphic in East Asians. Therefore, we aim to study other POAG-associated variants in this gene in East Asians, especially in our local population. Previously, we reported six ANGPT2 SNPs that were associated with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) [25]. As nAMD and PCV are related to retinal vessel abnormalities, we hypothesize these six ANGPT2 SNPs may also associate with POAG, in which SC is also a lymphatic-like vessel. In this study, we performed a SNP association analysis to determine the association of these six ANGPT2 SNPs with POAG.

Methods

Study participants

This study involved 2601 unrelated participants from two independent Chinese cohorts. One cohort is a Hong Kong Chinese cohort of 484 high tension glaucoma (HTG) and 537 normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients, and 496 non-glaucoma control subjects. Another cohort is a Shantou Chinese cohort of 403 HTG and 135 NTG patients, and 543 non-glaucoma control subjects. All participants are Han Chinese, recruited from the eye clinics of the Prince of Wales Hospital, the Hong Kong Eye Hospital and the Joint Shantou International Eye Center. The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee at the respective institutions (KC/KE-18-0045/ER-3). Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. The study procedures were performed in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Diagnosis was based on meeting all the following criteria: exclusion of secondary causes of glaucoma (steroid-induced glaucoma, neovascular glaucoma, uveitis or trauma); anterior chamber angle open (grade III or IV on gonioscopy); characteristic optic disc changes (vertical cup-to-disc ratio > 0.5, disc hemorrhage, or thin/notched neuroretinal rim); and characteristic visual field changes with reference to the Anderson’s criteria for minimal abnormality in glaucoma [26]. IOP was measured by using applanation tonometry and visual field was evaluated by a perimeter (Humphrey Field Analyzer; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) using the Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Patients whose highest recorded IOP lower than 21 mmHg without medication were regarded as NTG patients. Patients whose highest recorded IOP higher than or equal to 21 mmHg without medication were regarded as HTG patients. Patients with congenital glaucoma were excluded. People who attended the clinic for conditions other than glaucoma, including mild senile cataract, floaters, mild refractive errors and itchy eyes were recruited as non-glaucoma control subjects.

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) selection and genotyping

Six SNPs in ANGPT2 (rs2515487, rs2922869, rs13255574, rs4455855, rs13269021, and rs11775442) were reported as suggestive disease-association in nAMD and PCV [25]. These six SNPs are independent of each other. They were selected for genotyping assays in POAG patients from the Hong Kong and Shantou cohorts. Genomic DNA from peripheral blood was extracted using a QIAamp Blood Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. SNPs were genotyped using TaqMan genotyping assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with a Roche LightCycle 480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche Diagnostics; Basel, Switzerland) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) of each SNP in the non-glaucoma controls was assessed using the χ2 test in PLINK (v.1.07; available in the public domain at http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/purcell/plink/). Allelic and genotypic distributions were compared by the χ2 test between cases and controls among different study cohorts. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each SNP were calculated. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the genetic effects of the SNPs adjusted for age and sex.

To combine the data from the two study cohorts, we adopted the Mantel-Haenszel χ2 test to obtain the combined ORs and 95% CIs for all SNPs. The test was performed using Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.2; The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark).

In this study, we adopted the Bonferroni method to correct the P values in multiple testing. A final P value of less than 0.0083 (0.05/6, where 6 was the number of SNPs included in data analysis) would be required to conclude a significant disease association.

Results

Demographics and quality control outcomes

Table 1 shows the demographics of the POAG patients and non-glaucoma controls. Mean ages and sex ratios were statistically different between POAG cases and non-glaucoma control group in the two cohorts (P < 0.05; Table 1). Therefore, age and sex were adjusted in logistic regressions. In the Shantou cohort, all SNPs conformed to HWE (P > 0.05) in the non-glaucoma control group with call rates ≥ 98%. In the Hong Kong group, the rs2922869 showed deviation from HWE (P < 0.05) and thus was excluded from further analysis.

Table 1 Demographics of study subjects

Association of ANGPT2 with POAG

There was no significant association of all the six SNPs with NTG, HTG and POAG in individual cohorts or in the combined analyses after Bonferroni correction (P > 0.0083, Table 2). Only one SNP, rs11775442, showed a borderline association with NTG in the Hong Kong cohort at the level of P value < 0.05 (P = 0.0498, OR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.00–1.55) after adjusting for age and sex (Table 2).

Table 2 Association of SNPs from ANGPT2 in NTG, HTG and POAG adjusted for age and sex

In the subgroup analysis by sex, the top association was shown in SNP rs13269021 with NTG in Shantou males (P = 0.0081, OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.14–2.43; Table 3) but not in females (P = 0.874). With regards to the glaucoma subtypes, P values of this SNP were 0.040 in POAG (OR = 1.27) and 0.197 in HTG (OR = 1.17), which could not withstand the Bonferroni correction. Other associations were also non-significant after Bonferroni correction (P > 0.0083). Some of the SNP associations showed differences between male and female subgroups. In the Hong Kong cohort, the associations of rs13255574 in HTG (P = 0.010) and POAG (P = 0.017) in males could not withstand the Bonferroni correction, while P values of the associations were high in females i.e., HTG and POAG (P = 0.605 and 0.824, respectively). In the Shantou cohort, no SNP was significantly associated with NTG, HTG and POAG in both sexes. The meta-analysis of Hong Kong and Shantou subjects showed a slight difference between the sexes. The association of rs13269021 in POAG was still non-significant in meta-analysis (P = 0.020 in males and 0.94 in females, Fig. 1). In the combined analyses by sex, no SNP was significantly associated with NTG, HTG and POAG (P > 0.05).

Table 3 Association of SNPs from ANGPT2 in females and males with NTG, HTG and POAG
Fig. 1
figure 1

Association of rs1326901 with POAG using meta‐analysis in males (a) and females (b) combining the Hong Kong and Shantou cohorts. The association of rs13269021 in POAG was non-significant after combination by meta-analysis (P = 0.020 in males and 0.94 in females). CI, confidence interval; IV, inverse variance

Discussion

In this study, all six SNPs in ANGPT2 were not significantly associated with NTG, HTG and POAG in individual cohorts or in the combined analyses. Only SNP rs11775442 showed a nominal association with NTG in the Hong Kong cohort (P = 0.0498, OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.00–1.55) after adjusting for age and sex. It has been reported that rs11775442 (nAMD: P = 0.016; OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.0–1.92; PCV: P = 0.044; OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.01–1.79) were nominally associated with nAMD and PCV in the Hong Kong cohort [25]. Currently, no significant association has been reported between rs11775442 and any other disease. Further studies are needed to verify the association between SNP 11775442 with NTG.

In the subgroup analysis by sex, SNP rs13269021 in the Shantou cohort was significantly associated with NTG in males but not in females. Therefore, further studies to confirm its sex‐specific effects are warranted. Inconsistent results have been reported on the association of sex in POAG. In the United States, no significant sex difference in the POAG prevalence could be detected [27,28,29]. In contrast, a study from Netherlands reported a three-times higher POAG risk in males, while POAG was found more prevalent in females in an Australian study [30, 31]. In another study in African Americans, males showed a higher prevalence of POAG than females [32]. In the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study, males were found to possess an OR of 1.73 of having glaucoma vs. females [33]. Mechanistically, female sex hormones have been suggested to be protective against POAG [34, 35]. Serum estradiol levels were found positively correlated with the blood flow in the ophthalmic artery [36]. Menopause women receiving estradiol 17-valerate hormone replacement therapy showed significantly lower blood flow resistance in their central retinal arteries [37]. In addition, 17β-estradiol was also shown to protect retinal ganglion cells in rat and mouse glaucoma models [38, 39]. Interestingly, 17β-estradiol and another female sex hormone medroxyprogesterone acetate were able to reduce the protein production of ANGPT2 in human endometrial stromal cells [40]. Apart from our current study reporting ANGPT2 SNP (rs13269021) associating with male NTG in the Shantou cohort, a previous study found that BDNF Val66Met was associated with slower progression of POAG in females [41]. To our knowledge, our results are the first to highlight a sex-specific association of ANGPT2 in POAG.

The angiopoietin-Tie2 (Angpt-Tie2) pathway has been reported to control vascular maturation and stabilization [42]. Despite much research over the past decade, the roles of Angpt2 in the Angpt-Tie2 signaling system and vascular biology are still not fully understood. It is unclear whether Angpt2 is an antagonist or agonist of Tie2 in terms of vascular remodeling [42]. Better understanding of Angpt2 is very important to translate the use of its specific inhibitors alone or in combination with other anti-angiogenic agents into potential clinical treatments.

Regarding the SC, it has been reported that disruption of the Angpt-Tie2 signaling pathway results in high IOP, buphthalmos, and classical features of glaucoma, including retinal ganglion cell degeneration and vision loss in mice [21, 43]. Impairment of this system could be involved in the adult-onset POAG, as well as in the primary congenital glaucoma [44]. In our study, all six SNPs in ANGPT2 have not been found to be significantly associated with NTG, HTG and POAG in individual cohorts or in the combined analyses. Although Angpt-Tie2 signaling pathway is essential in the SC outflow pathway, Angpt2 was reported to play an indirect role as an agonist and an antagonist to Tie2 depending on the expression of an endothelial-specific phosphatase VEPTP [20]. Therefore, the genetic association between Angpt2 and POAG could also be influenced by the expression of other genes. For example, as a binding partner of Angpt2, a SVEP1 missense allele (rs61751937) has been reported to associate with POAG [22, 45]. According to the HapMap Genome Browser release #27 dataset, 34 SNPs could be selected in the locus of ANGPT2 [25]. In this study six SNPs were selected as they were reported as suggestive disease-associations in nAMD and PCV [25]. All these six SNPs are located in the introns of ANGPT2 [22]. Interestingly, instead of these six SNPs, SNP rs76020419 and rs2515437 have been reported to associate with POAG and elevated IOP [22,23,24]. rs76020419 is located in the 3ʹ untranslated region of ANGPT2, as well as in an intron of MCPH1. rs2515437 is located in the intron of ANGPT2 and MCPH1. MCPH1 encodes a microcephalin protein that is important for brain development [46]. Haplotype‐tagging SNP analysis of ANGPT2 and MCPH1 should be further studied in POAG patients.

In the subgroup analysis, our results indicated a male-specific association in rs13269021 in NTG from the Shantou cohort. In this cohort, rs13269021 conferred approximately 1.67-fold increased risk of NTG in males. But the OR of the SNP in females was 0.97, indicating a slightly decreased risk of NTG. The same effect has not been found in the Hong Kong cohort although the sample size of NTG patients from the Hong Kong cohort was larger than the Shantou cohort. Therefore, the sex-specific effects of this locus remained to be determined in more NTG samples.

Limitations

There are several limitations in this study. First, these six SNPs chosen according to our previous nAMD and PCV study could not cover the genetic linkage disequilibrium regions in the ANGPT2 gene. It may have narrowed the scope of the findings. Second, the key finding of rs13269021 in the Shantou cohort significantly associated with NTG in males but not in females could not be reproduced in the Hong Kong cohort. Our cohorts were limited to ethnic Chinese. Therefore, our results may not be translatable to other ethnicities. Third, all six SNPs are located in introns of ANGPT2. The functions of these SNPs are unclear. Indeed, no publication have reported that these six SNPs could cause any observable phenotypes.

Conclusions

In the subgroup analysis by sex, a significant association was shown in SNP rs13269021 with NTG in Shantou males, but not in Hong Kong males. Further studies are needed to verify the association between ANGPT2 locus (rs13269021) and NTG in Chinese males.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

References

  1. Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(5):614–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bourne RR, Taylor HR, Flaxman SR, Keeffe J, Leasher J, Naidoo K, et al. Number of people blind or visually impaired by glaucoma worldwide and in world regions 1990–2010: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0162229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sheffield VC, Stone EM, Alward WL, Drack AV, Johnson AT, Streb LM, et al. Genetic linkage of familial open angle glaucoma to chromosome 1q21–q31. Nat Genet. 1993;4(1):47–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stone EM, Fingert JH, Alward WL, Nguyen TD, Polansky JR, Sunden SL, et al. Identification of a gene that causes primary open angle glaucoma. Science. 1997;275(5300):668–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rezaie T, Child A, Hitchings R, Brice G, Miller L, Coca-Prados M, et al. Adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma caused by mutations in optineurin. Science. 2002;295(5557):1077–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sarfarazi M, Child A, Stoilova D, Brice G, Desai T, Trifan OC, et al. Localization of the fourth locus (GLC1E) for adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma to the 10p15-p14 region. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62(3):641–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pasutto F, Matsumoto T, Mardin CY, Sticht H, Brandstätter JH, Michels-Rautenstrauss K, et al. Heterozygous NTF4 mutations impairing neurotrophin-4 signaling in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;85(4):447–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Vithana EN, Nongpiur ME, Venkataraman D, Chan SH, Mavinahalli J, Aung T. Identification of a novel mutation in the NTF4 gene that causes primary open-angle glaucoma in a Chinese population. Mol Vis. 2010;16:1640–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bennett SR, Alward WL, Folberg R. An autosomal dominant form of low-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108(3):238–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fingert JH, Robin AL, Stone JL, Roos BR, Davis LK, Scheetz TE, et al. Copy number variations on chromosome 12q14 in patients with normal tension glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(12):2482–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ritch R, Darbro B, Menon G, Khanna CL, Solivan-Timpe F, Roos BR, et al. TBK1 gene duplication and normal-tension glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(5):544–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jonas JB, Aung T, Bourne RR, Bron AM, Ritch R, Panda-Jonas S. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2017;390(10108):2183–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Komaroff E, et al. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(1):48–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Llobet A, Gasull X, Gual A. Understanding trabecular meshwork physiology: a key to the control of intraocular pressure? News Physiol Sci. 2003;18:205–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Truong TN, Li H, Hong YK, Chen L. Novel characterization and live imaging of Schlemm’s canal expressing Prox-1. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e98245.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Aspelund A, Tammela T, Antila S, Nurmi H, Leppanen VM, Zarkada G, et al. The Schlemm’s canal is a VEGF-C/VEGFR-3-responsive lymphatic-like vessel. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(9):3975–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kizhatil K, Ryan M, Marchant JK, Henrich S, John SW. Schlemm’s canal is a unique vessel with a combination of blood vascular and lymphatic phenotypes that forms by a novel developmental process. PLoS Biol. 2014;12(7):e1001912.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Park DY, Lee J, Park I, Choi D, Lee S, Song S, et al. Lymphatic regulator PROX1 determines Schlemm’s canal integrity and identity. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(9):3960–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Augustin HG, Koh GY, Thurston G, Alitalo K. Control of vascular morphogenesis and homeostasis through the angiopoietin-Tie system. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10(3):165–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Souma T, Thomson BR, Heinen S, Carota IA, Yamaguchi S, Onay T, et al. Context-dependent functions of angiopoietin 2 are determined by the endothelial phosphatase VEPTP. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115(6):1298–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim J, Park DY, Bae H, Park DY, Kim D, Lee CK, et al. Impaired angiopoietin/Tie2 signaling compromises Schlemm’s canal integrity and induces glaucoma. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(10):3877–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gharahkhani P, Jorgenson E, Hysi P, Khawaja AP, Pendergrass S, Han X, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 127 open-angle glaucoma loci with consistent effect across ancestries. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1258.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Khawaja AP, Cooke Bailey JN, Wareham NJ, Scott RA, Simcoe M, Igo RP Jr, et al. Genome-wide analyses identify 68 new loci associated with intraocular pressure and improve risk prediction for primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2018;50(6):778–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. MacGregor S, Ong JS, An J, Han X, Zhou T, Siggs OM, et al. Genome-wide association study of intraocular pressure uncovers new pathways to glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2018;50(8):1067–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ma L, Brelen ME, Tsujikawa M, Chen H, Chu WK, Lai TY, et al. Identification of ANGPT2 as a new gene for neovascular age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy in the Chinese and Japanese populations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(2):1076–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated static perimetry. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Friedman DS, Wolfs RC, O’Colmain BJ, Klein BE, Taylor HR, West S, et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(4):532–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, Royall RM, Quigley HA, Javitt J. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA. 1991;266(3):369–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Klein BE, Klein R, Sponsel WE, Franke T, Cantor LB, Martone J, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(10):1499–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dielemans I, Vingerling JR, Wolfs RC, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, de Jong PT. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in a population-based study in the Netherlands. The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(11):1851–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K, Healey PR. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(10):1661–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Leske MC, Connell AM, Schachat AP, Hyman L. The Barbados Eye Study. Prevalence of open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112(6):821–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Doshi V, Ying-Lai M, Azen SP, Varma R, Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. Sociodemographic, family history, and lifestyle risk factors for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(4):639–47.e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee AJ, Mitchell P, Rochtchina E, Healey PR, Blue Mountains Eye Study. Female reproductive factors and open angle glaucoma: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(11):1324–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Pasquale LR, Rosner BA, Hankinson SE, Kang JH. Attributes of female reproductive aging and their relation to primary open-angle glaucoma: a prospective study. J Glaucoma. 2007;16(7):598–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Toker E, Yenice O, Akpinar I, Aribal E, Kazokoglu H. The influence of sex hormones on ocular blood flow in women. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003;81(6):617–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Atalay E, Karaali K, Akar M, Ari ES, Simsek M, Atalay S, et al. Early impact of hormone replacement therapy on vascular hemodynamics detected via ocular colour Doppler analysis. Maturitas. 2005;50(4):282–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhou X, Li F, Ge J, Sarkisian SR Jr, Tomita H, Zaharia A, et al. Retinal ganglion cell protection by 17-beta-estradiol in a mouse model of inherited glaucoma. Dev Neurobiol. 2007;67(5):603–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Russo R, Cavaliere F, Watanabe C, Nucci C, Bagetta G, Corasaniti MT, et al. 17Beta-estradiol prevents retinal ganglion cell loss induced by acute rise of intraocular pressure in rat. Prog Brain Res. 2008;173:583–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tsuzuki T, Okada H, Cho H, Shimoi K, Miyashiro H, Yasuda K, et al. Divergent regulation of angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2, and vascular endothelial growth factor by hypoxia and female sex steroids in human endometrial stromal cells. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;168(1):95–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shen T, Gupta VK, Klistorner A, Chitranshi N, Graham SL, You Y. Sex-specific effect of BDNF Val66Met genotypes on the progression of open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(4):1069–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Thurston G, Daly C. The complex role of angiopoietin-2 in the angiopoietin-tie signaling pathway. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(9):a006550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Thomson BR, Heinen S, Jeansson M, Ghosh AK, Fatima A, Sung HK, et al. A lymphatic defect causes ocular hypertension and glaucoma in mice. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(10):4320–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Souma T, Tompson SW, Thomson BR, Siggs OM, Kizhatil K, Yamaguchi S, et al. Angiopoietin receptor TEK mutations underlie primary congenital glaucoma with variable expressivity. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(7):2575–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Morooka N, Futaki S, Sato-Nishiuchi R, Nishino M, Totani Y, Shimono C, et al. Polydom is an extracellular matrix protein involved in lymphatic vessel remodeling. Circ Res. 2017;120(8):1276–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jackson AP, Eastwood H, Bell SM, Adu J, Toomes C, Carr IM, et al. Identification of microcephalin, a protein implicated in determining the size of the human brain. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71(1):136–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to all participants in this study.

Funding

This work is supported by the Lam Kin Chung. Jet King-Shing Ho Glaucoma Treatment and Research Centre and the Lim Por-Yen Eye Genetics Research Centre.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JNH, CPP and WKC designed the study; PPC and CCT collected clinical materials; JNH, TKN, SYL and WKC performed research; JNH, TKN, SYL, POST, CPP, LJC and WKC analyzed data; JNH, SYL, CPP and WKC wrote the manuscript; and CPP and WKC supervised the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wai Kit Chu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kowloon Central/Kowloon East of the Hospital Authority (Protocol code KC/KE-18-0045/ER-3). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, J.N., Ng, T.K., Lu, S.Y. et al. Genetic association of ANGPT2 with primary open-angle glaucoma. Eye and Vis 9, 37 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-022-00309-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-022-00309-y

Keywords