Skip to main content

Evening exercise is associated with lower odds of visual field progression in Chinese patients with primary open angle glaucoma



Exercise is widely known to lower intraocular pressure and increase ocular blood flow, which may be beneficial for glaucoma management. However, there are few studies that have reported on the relationship between exercise and glaucoma progression. The aim of our study was to investigate the exercise habits of those with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and its association with the progression of visual field (VF) loss.


Daily physical activity (PA) was monitored by an accelerometer (ActiGraph wGT3x-BT) which patients wore for more than 10 h of being awake on their right wrists for 1 week.


Seventy-one non-progressive and 27 progressive patients were enrolled in the study. 24-h moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) exercise showed that POAG patients had similar variation trends consisting of 3 wave peaks and 2 wave hollows. Minutes spent in MVPA was 19.89 ± 15.81 and 21.62 ± 15.10 during 07:00–09:00 h (p = 0.204), 15.40 ± 14.49 and 15.67 ± 12.43 during 15:00–17:00 h (p = 0.822) and 17.26 ± 21.11 and 11.42 ± 11.58 during 18:00–20:00 h (p = 0.001) in the non-progressive and progressive group, respectively. Univariate analysis indicated that 10 min of MVPA (18:00–20:00 h) [odds ratio, OR (95% CI) = 0.82 (0.73, 0.92)], average mean arterial pressure [OR (95% CI) = 0.96 (0.94, 0.98)], age [OR (95% CI) = 1.06 (1.03, 1.08)], male [OR (95% CI) = 0.67 (0.48, 0.96)], spherical equivalent [OR (95% CI) = 1.14 (1.07, 1.22)] and IOP-lowering medications [OR (95% CI) = 1.54 (1.16, 2.05)] were significantly correlated with having progressive VF damage. Multivariable analysis showed that 10 min of MVPA (18:00–20:00 h) [OR (95% CI) = 0.85 (0.75, 0.97)] was associated with progressive VF loss even after adjusting for other risk factors.


Evening exercise may lower the odds of VF progression, suggesting that exercise habits possibly play an important role in glaucoma progression.


Glaucoma is a multifactorial optic neuropathy with an unclear pathogenesis which can result in irreversible visual field (VF) damage [1]. The number of glaucoma patients (40 to 80 years old) is estimated to be 76.0 million by 2020 worldwide, and projected to increase to 111.8 million by 2040 [2]. Currently, intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only modifiable risk factor for preventing glaucoma damage. However, patients diagnosed with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and high-tension glaucoma (HTG) can still experience progressive VF loss even with a normal IOP. The Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial (EMGT) showed that 56% of untreated NTG patients progressed during the 6-year follow up [3]. In the Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study (CNTGS), about one third of untreated subjects had localized progression within a three-year span, and up to 50% within 5 to 7 years [4]. Forty-five percent of open angle glaucoma patients demonstrated VF progression in the EMGT study [5]. In addition, large IOP reductions do not necessarily stop the progression of NTG. A comparison of the spontaneous untreated group and lowered-IOP group (decreased by 30% from baseline) in the CNTGS study found that 35% of control eyes and 12% of treated eyes showed optic disk progression or VF loss [6]. It is clear that non-IOP factors played an important role in the development of the disease since glaucomatous progression was only slowed, rather than halted in subjects with normal IOP levels.

Physical activity (PA) is an essential part of daily life, with PA guidelines in the US advising adults to set aside time for at least 150 min to 300 min of moderate intensity PA per week or 75 min to 150 min of vigorous intensity aerobic PA per week to stay healthy [7]. The health benefits of PA have been widely documented for both systemic and ocular diseases including boosting the immune system, improving sleep quality, reducing the incidence of cardiac-cerebral vascular events and is correlated with decreased anxiety and depression rates [8,9,10,11,12]. For eyes in particular, exercise can decrease the IOP [13] and decreasing IOP is associated with the magnitude of exercise [14]. Moreover, choroidal blood flow increases substantially in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients with elevated exercise-induced blood pressure [15]. However, there is little conclusive evidence proving the effectiveness of exercise in mitigating glaucomatous VF loss, with many studies collecting patients’ physical activities through self-reported questionnaires [16, 17].

The objective of this study is to quantitatively monitor the daily PA of POAG patients and investigate the relationship between their exercise habits and progressive glaucomatous VF defect.


The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Wenzhou Medical University (KYK [2018]20). Participants gave written informed consent and completed the study procedures between August 2017 and June 2018. The study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study participants

Subjects were recruited from the Wenzhou Glaucoma Progression Study (WGPS), a longitudinal study exploring POAG patients’ glaucomatous clinical features and progression. POAG was defined as (1) open angles on gonioscopy, (2) glaucomatous optic disc changes, including neuroretinal rim narrowing, notching and retinal nerve fiber layer defects, (3) repeatable VF defects, (4) above changes in the absence of any other identifiable cause. Subjects were excluded if they were less than 18 years of age or they had any history of intraocular surgery (except uncomplicated cataract or glaucoma surgery).

All participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination in the Clinical and Epidemiological Eye Research Center of the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University involving a questionnaire on the use of IOP-lowering medications and past medical history, gonioscopy, automated refraction (WAM-5500, Grand Seiko, Japan), Goldmann applanation tonometry (HAAG-STREIT 900 CM, Swiss), VF testing (Humphrey Field Analyzer IIi (HFA IIi, Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, CA), optical coherence tomography (OCT, Carl Zeiss Cirrus HD-OCT 4000, Germany), Lenstar (HAAG-STREIT LS900, Swiss), blood pressure (BP) measurements (Omron Automatic BP instrument (model HEM-7136, Omron Healthcare, Inc., IL) and other basic parameters. Patients were advised to follow up at the center every three to 6 months. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated as (1/3 systolic BP + 2/3 diastolic BP) while average MAP (aMAP) was the average MAP during all visits (from the baseline to the most recent visit). Mean IOP (mIOP) was obtained by averaging the IOP from all visits. PA was also measured during the follow-ups.

A total of 106 participants took part in the cross-sectional study. There were seven (6.60%) subjects with poor compliance and one (0.94%) subject whose device had technical issues. In the end, data from 98 patients were analyzed, including 27 patients in the progressive group and 71 patients in the non-progressive group. A valid day was defined as more than 10 h of awake wear time [18], and patients with less than six valid days were excluded from the study.

Evaluation of physical activity

The accelerometer, ActiGraph wGT3x-BT (LLC, Pensacola, FL, USA), is an important tool that can accurately measure a person’s daily PA intensity and duration [19, 20]. Participants’ daily PA was recorded by the accelerometer (worn on the right wrist) for 1 week [21, 22]. Subjects were instructed on proper usage of the device and informed to take the device off when swimming or showering. Patients were also advised to wear the accelerometer for the entire day unless it was uncomfortable, or that it affected their sleep. Main measures of PA included calories burned per day, light PA (LPA) time per day, moderate PA (MPA) time per day, vigorous PA (VPA) time per day, very vigorous PA (VVPA) time per day, moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) time per day and step counts. ActiLife software (version 6.13.3; ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL) was used to process the raw data and the values were presented as total daily and hourly counts per minute. Acceleration for x-, y-, and z-axes and vector magnitude (VM) were converted to 10 s epochs. Kcals was calculated by Freedson VM3 Combination (2011), kcals = S × [0.00097 × VM (x, y, z) + (0.08793 × BM)] - 5.01582, S = Duration of exercise (s)/60s, BM = Body Mass (kg) [23]. We used the validated Sasaki’s cut-point sets to estimate the amount of PA time: LPA, ≤2690 bouts; MPA, 2691~6166 bouts; VPA, 6167~9642 bouts; VVPA, ≥9643 bouts [24]. During this period, subjects were reminded to maintain their daily lifestyle and to not deliberately increase their total amount of exercise. Subjects were queried by phone call to verify the estimated wear time if any doubts about their compliance arose.

Detection of visual field

Participants recruited from the WGPS needed to have at least 4 regular, reliable VF examinations (< 20% fixation losses and < 15% false-positive results). Humphrey VF testing was performed using the 24–2 Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (Standard) with stimulus size III after near refractive correction.

Definition: progressive VF defect

Progressive VF loss was defined as statistically significant deterioration (p < 0.05) on the pattern deviation change probability maps in the same three or more points with confirmation by at least two consecutive visits using the event-based glaucoma change probability (GCP) analysis of the Humphrey field analyzer in the Forum Glaucoma Workplace (Zeiss Carl-Forum 4.0) [25, 26].

Recruited glaucoma subjects were divided into the progressive and non-progressive group depending on the nature of their disease. Daily PA was compared between these two groups. Patients were classified as a progressor if they had at least one eye with progressive VF loss. Data for both eyes were obtained, and for the non-progressive group, the worse eye was chosen. For patients with two progressive eyes, the worse progressive eye was chosen, and for patients with only one progressive eye, the progressive eye was selected. The average data of all visits, such as IOP and MAP were used in the study. The presenting visual acuity at the time of PA assessment was used and data involving other parameters were from the baseline.

Statistical methods

Statistics were performed using SPSS (version 21.0). A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Demographics, ocular characteristics, and PA are presented using mean and standard deviation and compared between the non-progressive and progressive group using an independent sample t-test for normally-distributed continuous variables, the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed continuous variables, and a Chi-squared test for categorical variables. Logistic regression was used to explore the association of binary dependent variable “progression of glaucoma” with continuous or categorical independent variables.


Seventy-one patients with non-progressive VF loss (61.45 ± 12.99 years, 53.52% male) and 27 patients with progressive VF loss (67.22 ± 8.93 years, 44.44% male) who had no less than 6 days of valid accelerometer data were enrolled from the WGPS. POAG patients with and without progressive VF damage were similar in gender, body-mass index, mIOP, aMAP, visual field MD, retinal nerve fiber layer, presenting visual acuity, spherical equivalent, axial lengths, central corneal thickness, IOP-lowering medications, self-reported hypertension, self-reported diabetes, total days of PA measurement, follow-up period and number of follow-ups (p > 0.05 for all), but differed in age (p = 0.023) (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographics and ocular characteristics of non-progressive and progressive patients

Median calories burned per day was 3563.44 ± 1832.82 kcal and 2909.29 ± 1250.14 kcal in the non-progressive and progressive group, respectively (p = 0.111). A comparison of POAG patients’ total PA duration for all exercise levels (light, moderate, vigorous, very vigorous and MVPA) revealed no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05 for all). There was also no significant difference for total step count between the two groups (p = 0.617) (Table 2).

Table 2 Difference in physical activity time between non-progressive and progressive patients

The line graph illustrates the variation of MVPA time subjects spent over a whole day. MVPA fluctuations for the non-progressive and progressive groups had similar trends in variation (3 wave peaks and 2 wave hollows). The average number of minutes patients spent in MVPA during 07:00–09:00 h was 19.89 ± 15.81 and 21.62 ± 15.10 (p = 0.204), 15.40 ± 14.49 and 15.67 ± 12.43 during 15:00–17:00 h (p = 0.822), and 17.26 ± 21.11 and 11.42 ± 11.58 during 18:00–20:00 h (p = 0.001) in the non-progressive and progressive group, respectively (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

24-h variation of MVPA time shown (3 wave peaks and 2 wave hollows) for the non-progressive and progressive groups. The MVPA time have significant difference between those two groups during 18:00–20:00 pm, but have no statistical difference during 07:00–09:00 am and 15:00–17:00 pm

To investigate other possible factors influencing progressive VF loss of POAG patients, we conducted a binary logistic regression (univariate and multivariable analysis). Univariate analysis indicated that 10 min of MVPA (18:00–20:00 h) [Odds ratio, OR (95% CI) = 0.82 (0.73, 0.92)], average mean arterial pressure (aMAP) [OR (95% CI) = 0.96 (0.94, 0.98)], age [OR (95% CI) = 1.06 (1.03, 1.08)], male [OR (95% CI) = 0.67 (0.48, 0.96)], spherical equivalent (SE) [OR (95% CI) = 1.14 (1.07, 1.22)] and IOP-lowering medications [OR (95% CI) = 1.54 (1.16, 2.05)] were significantly correlated with having progressive VF damage. Multivariable analysis showed that the following features were associated with progressive VF defect: 10 min spent in MVPA [OR (95% CI) = 0.85 (0.75, 0.97)], aMAP [OR (95% CI) = 0.95 (0.93, 0.97)], age [OR (95% CI) =1.08 (1.05, 1.11)], SE [OR (95% CI) = 1.11 (1.02, 1.20)] and lowering-IOP medications [OR (95% CI) = 2.95 (2.02, 4.31)] (Table 3).

Table 3 Univariate and multivariable odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals for VF progression of POAG patients


This study objectively monitored the 24-h PA of POAG patients to provide a solid portrayal of their daily PA lifestyle. Adjusted OR for MVPA time per 10 min (18:00–20:00 h) was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75–0.97) for subjects with progressive VF defect in comparison to those with non-progressive VF damage, indicating an increase of time spent in MVPA by 10 min decreases the odds of progressive VF defect by 15%. However, daily PA time of different intensity had no statistical association with progressive glaucomatous VF loss. Lee and his team [21] investigated 141 suspects or manifest glaucoma patients and found that increased PA such as walking, MVPA, and non-sedentary activity were associated with slower rates of VF loss. This discrepancy may have arisen from differences in subject characteristics (POAG vs. suspects and manifest glaucoma), measurement of VF progression (progressor vs. the rate of VF loss) and enrollment criteria (without intraocular surgery vs. conditional surgery).

The levels of VF damage may affect patients’ daily physical activities. Ramulu [22] monitored 83 glaucoma subjects and 58 controls for their daily minutes of MVPA and steps per day, finding that daily PA time was impacted by glaucomatous VF loss. In our study, the chosen eye (worse or progressive eye) VF mean deviations were − 6.22 ± 6.09 dB in the non-progressive group and − 7.73 ± 5.45 dB in the progressive group (p = 0.084) at the time of PA assessment. In addition, the percentage of people with mild to moderate VF defect was 94.40 and 92.60% in these two groups (p = 0.744). Overall, no significant difference in presenting visual acuity was found between the two groups, reducing the possibility that progressors exercise less in the evening due to the severe VF loss.

This is the first study showing a correlation between evening exercise (18:00–20:00 h) and VF loss progression in glaucoma. Circadian rhythms and cyclical physiological changes over a 24-h period may play an important role in the findings as the choice of what time of day to exercise heavily influences physiological variables. Many biological functions have been shown to be time-of-day dependent as their physiological levels fluctuate throughout the day. Ammar A [27] summarized the effects of time-of-day on many physiological functions and how biological parameters adjust in response to increased PA of healthy subjects. In the early evening, individuals have a higher rate of oxidative stress, white blood cell count, homocysteine and muscle damage markers, and a more efficient antioxidant activity than in the early morning. Trabelsi K [28] explored the diurnal variation (08:00 h, 14:00 h and 18:00 h) of the same hematological parameters and found that total white blood cell count (WBC) (p < 0.01) and neutrophils count (NE) (p < 0.01) have higher resting values in the early evening than in the morning. Previous research has also shown that the impact of repeated sprinting exercises on hematocytes [WBC, NE, lymphocytes (LY) and monocytes (MO)] being dependent on the time-of-day, with greater values obtained in the early evening [29]. Additionally, the effect of time-of-day on many physiological functions can change in response to PA. Studies demonstrate that in the evening, aerobic exercise’s time to exhaustion, body temperature, peak oxygen consumption and aerobic system response, are higher in comparison to the same measures in the morning [27, 30, 31]. Evening exercise is better than morning exercise for fat oxidation levels and energy expenditure (EE) as EE and oxygen uptake are higher in the evening [32, 33]. Nikkhah A [34] also demonstrated that early night exercise can decrease cellular irresponsiveness to insulin, particularly for those overweight or obese. Metabolic levels not only depend on the time-of-day, but also change in response to PA. Therefore, an individual’s metabolic levels vary depending on when he or she chooses to exercise. However, the underlying mechanism responsible for the relationship between evening exercise and glaucomatous VF progression remains unclear.

Furthermore, it is widely believed that elevated IOP, vascular dysregulation, and perfusion deficit may lead to glaucoma progression [35, 36]. Elevated IOP is the only modifiable risk factor for most glaucoma subtypes, including POAG. Decreased ocular perfusion and vascular dysregulation has also been implicated as a major risk factor for glaucoma [37, 38]. Past research has shown that dynamic exercise significantly reduces IOP and increases ocular blood flow. Natsis K [39] found that aerobic exercise can help reduce IOP even when patients are already on various antihypertensive drugs. Hayashi N [40] reported that increasing exercise intensity induces rising retina and choroidal blood flow. Portmann N [15] explored the response of submacular choroid blood flow (ChBF) to isometric exercise and observed that POAG patients have a smaller active regulatory capacity and a larger increase in ChBF after exercising in comparison with their healthy counterparts, indicating that ocular blood flow in POAG patients is more sensitive to exercise. Taken together, exercise not only decreases IOP, but also increases ocular perfusion (ChBF, ocular perfusion pressure and ocular blood pressure), which may explain why more PA is associated with lower risk of glaucomatous progressive VF damage.

Much like other patients with chronic diseases, glaucoma patients are more likely to have depression with a reported prevalence of 10.9% in comparison with those without glaucoma (6.9%) [41]. Literature has shown that exercise reduces the incidence of depression or anxiety [8, 42, 43]. For example, Babyak M [44] investigated 156 adult volunteers with major depressive disorder for 10 months, and found that increasing exercise time lowers depression relapse rates in comparison to that of the medication group. Apart from alleviating depression, exercise can also improve sleep quality, reduce morbidity of cardiovascular diseases, boost the immune system, and even promote neuronal plasticity [8,9,10,11,12, 45], and thus have comprehensive benefits not only for the eyes, but the entire body.

An advantage of our study includes using a widely recognized accelerometer to.

measure the 24-h PA of patients to provide objective, comprehensive results. Additionally, our study is the first to discuss the relationship of exercise habits and glaucomatous VF progressive defect, finding that more evening exercise was associated with lower odds of VF progression. During the follow-up visits, we collected data on mean IOP and MAP and adjusted them in the multivariable analysis. Furthermore, the diagnosis of POAG was performed clinically, which was more accurate than population-based designs [16, 17]. However, there are several limitations in our work: Firstly, our study is an observational study, so we cannot conclude that there is a causal relationship between evening exercise and progressive VF defect. Secondly, the device is not waterproof, and we did not monitor swimming PA time, which may have resulted in a lesser amount of recorded PA time. Anticipating this, we asked all our subjects if they swim regularly and found that 93 (94.9%) never swim, one (1.0%) swims regularly in the summertime and four (4.1%) occasionally swim, indicating this to be a minor flaw. Thirdly, using the monitor to measure the daily PA of the elderly with visual impairment may have some deviations than that in the other elderly. However, to our knowledge, no validity studies exist on tools that measure PA in patients with ocular disorders. Valid and specific tools need to be designed in future studies when measuring daily PA for the elderly with visual impairment. Lastly, age was not matched in the progressive and non-progressive group and there was no control group without POAG. Although the age factor was adjusted in the multivariate analysis, a health control group could provide a well-balanced comparison between the groups.


In conclusion, our study found that more evening exercise (MVPA) was associated with lower odds of progressive VF damage in patients with POAG. Our data suggest that exercise habits may play an important role in glaucoma progression, but a prospective, interventional study is needed to confirm our findings.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Axial lengths


Body-mass index


Central corneal thickness


Choroid blood flow


Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study


Energy expenditure


Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial


High-tension glaucoma


Intraocular pressure


Interquartile Range




Mean arterial pressure




Moderate to vigorous physical activity


Neutrophils count


Normal tension glaucoma


Odds ratio


Physical activity


Primary open angle glaucoma


Retinal nerve fiber layer


Spherical equivalent


Visual field


White blood cell


Wenzhou Glaucoma Progression Study


  1. 1.

    Weinreb RN, Khaw PT. Primary open-angle glaucoma. Lancet. 2004;363(9422):1711–20.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081–90.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Heijl A, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Leske MC, Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Natural history of open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(12):2271–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Anderson DR, Drance SM, Schulzer M. Natural history of normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(2):247–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(4):487–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Lichter PR, Niziol LM, Janz NK, CIGTS study investigators. Visual field progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: the impact of treatment and other baseline factors. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(2):200–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, et al. The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2018;320(19):2020–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kanamori S, Takamiya T, Inoue S, Kai Y, Tsuji T, Kondo K. Frequency and pattern of exercise and depression after two years in older Japanese adults: the JAGES longitudinal study. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):11224.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gleeson M. Immune function and exercise. Eur J Sport Sci. 2004;4(3):52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kelley GA, Kelley KS. Exercise and sleep: a systematic review of previous meta-analyses. J Evid Based Med. 2016;10(1):26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Leung FP, Yung LM, Laher I, Yao X, Chen ZY, Huang Y. Exercise, vascular wall and cardiovascular diseases: an update (part 1). Sports Med. 2008;38(12):1009–24.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yung LM, Laher I, Yao X, Chen ZY, Huang Y, Leung FP. Exercise, vascular wall and cardiovascular diseases: an update (part2). Sports Med. 2008;39(1):45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yan X, Li M, Song Y, Guo J, Zhao Y, Chen W, et al. Influence of exercise on intraocular pressure, Schlemm's canal, and the trabecular meshwork. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(11):4733–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Qureshi IA. The effects of mild, moderate, and severe exercise on intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients. Jpn J Physiol. 1995;45(4):561–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Portmann N, Gugleta K, Kochkorov A, Polunina A, Flammer J, Orgul S. Choroidal blood flow response to isometric exercise in glaucoma patients and patients with ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(10):7068–73.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lin SC, Wang SY, Pasquale LR, Singh K, Lin SC. The relation between exercise and glaucoma in a south Korean population-based sample. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171441.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Williams PT. Relationship of incident glaucoma versus physical activity and fitness in male runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(8):1566–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Collings PJ, Brage S, Ridgway CL, Harvey NC, Godfrey KM, Inskip HM, et al. Physical activity intensity, sedentary time, and body composition in preschoolers. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(5):1020–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bouten CV, Koekkoek KT, Verduin M, Kodde R, Janssen JD. A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997;44(3):136–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cheung VH, Gray L, Karunanithi M. Review of accelerometry for determining daily activity among elderly patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(6):998–1014.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lee MJ, Wang J, Friedman DS, Boland MV, De Moraes CG, Ramulu PY. Greater physical activity is associated with slower visual field loss in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(7):958–64.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ramulu PY, Maul E, Hochberg C, Chan ES, Ferrucci L, Friedman DS. Real-world assessment of physical activity in glaucoma using an accelerometer. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(6):1159–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    ActiGraph Monitor [EB/OL].

  24. 24.

    Sasaki JE, John D, Freedson PS. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14(5):411–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bengtsson B, Lindgren A, Heijl A, Lindgren G, Asman P, Patella M. Perimetric probability maps to separate change caused by glaucoma from that caused by cataract. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75(2):184–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Katz J. A comparison of the pattern- and total deviation-based Glaucoma Change Probability programs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(5):1012–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ammar A, Chtourou H, Souissi N. Effect of time-of-day on biochemical markers in response to physical exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(1):272–82.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ammar A, Chtourou H, Trabelsi K, Padulo J, Turki M, El Abed K. Temporal specificity of training: intra-day effects on biochemical responses and Olympic-Weightlifting performances. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(4):358–68.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hammouda O, Chtourou H, Chahed H, Ferchichi S, Kallel C, Miled A, et al. Diurnal variations of plasma homocysteine, total antioxidant status, and biological markers of muscle injury during repeated sprint: effect on performance and muscle fatigue--a pilot study. Chronobiol Int. 2011;28(10):958–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Yamanaka Y, Honma KI, Hashimoto S, Takasu N, Miyazaki T, Honama S. Effects of physical exercise on human circadian rhythms. Sleep Biol Rhythms. 2006;4(3):199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hill DW, Borden DO, Darnaby KM, Hendricks DN, Hill CM. Effect of time of day on aerobic and anaerobic responses to high-intensity exercise. Can J Sport Sci. 1992;17(4):316–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Azizi M, Rahmani-Nia F, Mohebbi H. Cortisol responses and energy expenditure at different times of day in obese Vs. lean men. World J Sport Sci. 2012;6(3):314–20.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hamid M, Mohammad A. Maximal fat oxidation at the different exercise intensity in obese and normal weight men in the morning and evening. J Human Sport Exer. 2011;6(1):49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Nikkhah A. Evening exercise to prevent central adiposity and cardiometabolic diseases. Int J Diabetol Vasc Dis Res. 2015;3(6):113–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Hussein M. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(10):1268–79.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Liu CH, Su WW, Shie SS, Cheng ST, Su CW, Ho WJ. Association between peripheral vascular endothelial function and progression of open-angle glaucoma. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(10):e3055.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Risner D, Ehrlich R, Kheradiya NS, Siesky B, McCranor L, Harris A. Effects of exercise on intraocular pressure and ocular blood flow: a review. J Glaucoma. 2009;18(6):429–36.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Caprioli J, Coleman AL, Blood flow in Glaucoma discussion. Blood pressure, perfusion pressure, and glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(5):704–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Natsis K, Asouhidou I, Nousios G, Chatzibalis T, Vlasis K, Karabatakis V. Aerobic exercise and intraocular pressure in normotensive and glaucoma patients. BMC Ophthalmol. 2009;9:6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hayashi N, Ikemura T, Someya N. Effects of dynamic exercise and its intensity on ocular blood flow in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(10):2601–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Wang SY, Singh K, Lina SC. Prevalence and predictors of depression among participants with glaucoma in a nationally representative population sample. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154(3):436–44.e2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ströhle A. Physical activity, exercise, depression and anxiety disorders. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2009;116(6):777–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lawlor DA, Hopker SW. The effectiveness of exercise as an intervention in the management of depression: systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2001;322(7289):763–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Babyak M, Blumenthal JA, Herman S, Khatri P, Doraiswamy M, Moore K, et al. Exercise treatment for major depression: maintenance of therapeutic benefit at 10 months. Psychosom Med. 2000;62(5):633–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Sandrow-Feinberg HR, Houlé JD. Exercise after spinal cord injury as an agent for neuroprotection, regeneration and rehabilitation. Brain Res. 2015;1619:12–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Kemi Feng for statistical consultation, Haishuang Hu and Qiangjie Huang for research assistance.


This study was supported by Wenzhou Medical University Research Fund. No. QTJ13009, Zhejiang Province Health Innovation Talents Project no. 2016025, Key Discipline of the Eye Hospital, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University Fund no. ZDZK201808 and the Innovation Research Project of the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University no. YNCX201308.

Author information




XFP collected and analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. XW, GFC and HHC collected data. YBL and JC conceived the study, participated in the discussion and revised the manuscript. KX, AJL, LTH and ZL contributed to discussion and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jie Chen or Yuanbo Liang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Wenzhou Medical University (KYK [2018]20).

Consent for publication

All patients gave informed consent.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pan, X., Xu, K., Wang, X. et al. Evening exercise is associated with lower odds of visual field progression in Chinese patients with primary open angle glaucoma. Eye and Vis 7, 12 (2020).

Download citation


  • Glaucoma
  • Exercise habits
  • Visual field progression