Skip to main content
Download PDF

Differences in choroidal responses to near work between myopic children and young adults

Eye and Vision volume 11, Article number: 12 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Near work is generally considered as a risk factor for myopia onset and progression. This study aimed to investigate the choroidal responses to a brief-period of near work in children and young adults.

Methods

Thirty myopic medical students (aged 18–28 years) and 30 myopic children (aged 8–12 years) participated in this study. The submacular total choroidal area (TCA), luminal area (LA), stromal area (SA), choroidal vascularity index (CVI) and choriocapillaris flow deficit (CcFD), as well as subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) were measured with swept-source optical coherence tomography/optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCT/OCTA) before and immediately after 20 min, 40 min, 60 min of near work at a distance of 33 cm.

Results

In adults, 20 min of near work induced a significant reduction in SFCT (− 5.1 ± 6.5 μm), LA [(− 19.2 ± 18.6) × 103 μm2], SA [(− 8.2 ± 12.6) × 103 μm2] and TCA [(− 27.4 ± 24.9) × 103 μm2] (all P < 0.01). After 40 min of near work, LA was still reduced [(− 9.4 ± 18.3) × 103 μm2], accompanied with a decreased CVI (− 0.39% ± 0.70%) and an increased CcFD (0.30% ± 0.78%) (all P < 0.05). After 60 min of near work, CVI was still reduced (− 0.28% ± 0.59%), and CcFD was still increased (0.37% ± 0.75%) (all P < 0.05). In children, 20 min of near work induced a significant increase in CcFD (0.55% ± 0.64%), while 60 min of near work induced increases in SA [(7.2 ± 13.0) × 103 μm2] and TCA [(9.7 ± 25.3) × 103 μm2] and a reduction in CVI (− 0.28% ± 0.72%) (all P < 0.05). Children exhibited lower near work-induced LA and TCA reduction than adults, with a mean difference of − 0.86% and − 0.82%, respectively (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The temporal characteristics and magnitude of changes of choroidal vascularity and choriocapillaris perfusion during near work was not identical between children and adults. The initial response to near work was observed in choriocapillaris in children, whereas it was observed in the medium- and large-sized vessels in adults.

Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), ChiCTR2000040205. Registered on 25 November 2020, https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=64501.

Background

Near work is generally thought to be a potential influencer for myopia onset and progression in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies [1]. Even though the burden of near work is not reduced in young adults, such as medical students, the rate of myopia progression is not as rapid as that in schoolchildren [2,3,4,5,6]. Such age-related difference in susceptibility to myopia has been demonstrated in animal models of experimentally induced myopia as well [7, 8]. However, the reason behind such differences is unknown.

The choroid is a highly vascularized tissue, exhibiting developmental changes during childhood and adolescence. Choroidal thickness tends to increase in early childhood [9,10,11], then reaches a peak in young adulthood, followed by a reduction with age in older individuals [12, 13]. Choroidal vascularity index (CVI) decreases with age in children and adults [14, 15], while choriocapillaris flow deficit percentage (CcFD%) was reported to be higher in adults than in children [14, 16]. Such developmental changes in choroidal vasculature suggest that the choroidal responses to near work might vary across these age cohorts.

Increasing evidence implicate the choroid to be involved in ocular growth regulation and myopia development through vision-driven local retina-choroid-scleral molecular signaling cascades [17, 18]. Recent findings from a near work guinea pig model showed that myopia development was accompanied by decreases in choroidal thickness and choroidal perfusion [19]. Clinical studies in children and young adults also reported choroidal thinning and reduction in choroidal perfusion in response to near work [20,21,22,23,24,25]. Nevertheless, it remains unknown whether these choroidal responses differ between children and young adults.

To this end, we here investigated the choroidal vascularity and choriocapillaris perfusion in response to near work in children and adults (medical students) and compared the temporal choroidal characteristics and magnitude of choroidal changes between these cohorts. The findings of this study will hopefully provide new insights for future studies exploring the role of the choroid in relation to near work and myopia development in different age groups.

Methods

Participants

Thirty medical students (aged 18–28 years) from Wenzhou Medical University and 30 children (aged 8–12 years) from the two prospective study cohorts and optometry outpatients at the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University were invited to participate in this study between January 2021 and May 2022. All participants were in good health and met the following inclusion criteria: (1) spherical equivalent refraction (SER) between − 6.00 diopters (D) and − 0.50 D; (2) astigmatism of less than 1.00 D; (3) best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of less than 0.0 logMAR; (4) intraocular pressure (IOP) of less than 21 mmHg; (5) amplitude of accommodation ≥ 6.00 D. Strabismus or amblyopia, smoking, previous eye surgery or trauma, other chronic ocular diseases and systemic diseases were the exclusion criteria. Subjects undergoing myopia control treatments (such as atropine drops, orthokeratology lenses, etc.) and use of prescription medicines were also excluded. All participants and the parents of children signed an informed consent. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University (2020-173-K-158-01).

Measurements and procedures

Medical histories were collected, and ophthalmologic examinations were performed to ascertain whether the subjects met the criteria. Non-cycloplegic subjective refraction was measured using a phoropter (RT-5100, NIDEK CO., LTD., Japan). IOP was measured by non-contact tonometry (Canon TX-20, Canon Inc., Japan). Axial length (AL), and corneal refractive power were measured using an IOL Master 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany). The amplitude of accommodation was measured by the push-up method using a Royal Air Force binocular gauge (Haag-Streit England, United Kingdom).

The participants were required to refrain from alcohol and caffeine for at least 24 h before each visit. The examinations were carried out at the same time (01:30 p.m. to 05:30 p.m.) over 3 separate days to minimize the influence of diurnal rhythms. In order to abrogate the effect of any visual tasks the subjects may have carried out before the visit, they initially watched a movie on a 65-inch television (65A57F, Hisense, China) at a distance of 3 meters for 15 min with their refractive errors fully corrected with trial lenses. Then, choroidal images of the right eyes were captured with SS-OCT/OCTA (VG200S, SVision Imaging, China) at baseline. This was followed by a near work activity, which in this case was to read an e-book on an Android tablet (HUAWEI AGS2-W09, 10.1 inches, screen resolution 1920 × 1200, screen luminance 200 nits) at a distance of 33 cm (3.00 D accommodation demand) for either 20, 40 or 60 min. The sequence of the three visits was randomized among subjects (Additional file 1). The participants read books they were interested in under the supervision of an investigator to ensure they were not distracted. The investigator recorded the page number before and after the reading task and checked the viewing distance every 5 min. In each visit, participants were asked to summarize what they had read to ensure they were actively reading. The texts were set in the same font, size, and line spacing (Chinese, 10.5 pt in Microsoft YaHei and double spaced) with dark letters on a bright background. After completion of the reading task, participants moved to the SS-OCT/OCTA and choroidal images were captured. The room light was maintained at 200 to 300 lx.

SS-OCT/OCTA imaging and analysis

The SS-OCT/OCTA system contains a swept-source laser with a central wavelength of approximately 1050 nm and a scan rate of 200,000 A-scans per second. The axial resolution, lateral resolution, and scan depth were 5 µm, 13 µm, and 3 mm, respectively.

Structural OCT imaging of the macular region was performed with 6 radial scan lines centered on the fovea (Fig. 1). Each scan line, generated by 2048 A-scans, was 12 mm long and separated from adjacent lines by 30 degrees. Sixty-four B-scans were obtained on each scan line and were automatically averaged to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. The images were analyzed with a fully automatic method. The segmentation of the choroidal boundaries was based on deep learning algorithms, ResNet-UNet neural network [26, 27]. Binarization was performed for the choroidal images based on Niblack’s auto local threshold, using custom-designed algorithms in MATLAB R2017a (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) [26, 27]. The vessels and stroma in the choroid were demarcated with red dotted lines. The submacular total choroidal area (TCA), luminal area (LA), and stromal area (SA) in a 6 mm submacular region centered on the fovea, as well as subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) were calculated. The CVI was defined as the ratio of LA to TCA [28, 29]. All choroidal metrics were estimated by calculating the mean values of the vertical and horizontal meridians (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Illustration of choroidal vasculature analysis. a Schematic diagram of structural optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of the macular region with 6 radial scan lines centered on the fovea. b, c Overlays of binarized choroidal areas on original images in vertical (b) and horizontal (c) meridian. The 6-mm wide submacular area between white vertical lines, centered on the fovea, was used for analysis. The yellow vertical line represented the subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT). SER,  spherical equivalent refraction; AL,  axial length

Full size image

OCTA fundus images were obtained with a raster scan protocol of 512 horizontal B-scans that covered an area of 3 mm × 3 mm centered on the fovea (Fig. 2). The B-scans, which contained 512 A-scans each, were repeated 6 times and averaged. The choriocapillaris layer was defined as a slab from the basal border of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)-Bruch’s membrane (BM) complex to 20 µm below it [30], which was recognized by the machine-built algorithm automatically and corrected manually if necessary. Each image was compensated to remove retinal vessel projection artifacts and to adjust for shadowing artifacts [31]. The choriocapillaris flow deficit (CcFD), indicating the region with absence of flow signals from choriocapillaris, was analyzed with machine-built algorithms [a global thresholding method with a threshold of 1.5 times the standard deviation (1.5 × SD method)] [31]. This method utilizes a mean SD of a normal database that included 19 subjects aged between 20 and 35 years, which was approximately 30 in gray level, and the binarized image of CcFD closely resembles that in the original OCTA image [30]. The CcFD was calculated in a 2.5 mm diameter circular region centered on the fovea by examining the B-scans vertically and horizontally (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Illustration of choriocapillaris perfusion analysis. a Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) scan region of nominally 3 mm × 3 mm, centered on the fovea. b Magnified en face OCTA choriocapillaris image within a 2.5 mm diameter circle, which was centered on the fovea through examining (c) vertical and (d) horizontal meridian scans across the fovea and was segmented as a 20 µm thickness slab below Bruch’s membrane (BM). SER,  spherical equivalent refraction; AL,  axial length

Full size image

An OCT and OCTA signal strength of above 8 was deemed fit for further analysis. The scale of both OCT and OCTA images were adjusted for the differences in magnification due to differences in ocular length [32]. All images were acquired using the follow-up mode in the equipment that ensured the same choroidal region was captured on each visit. Repeatability was assessed by capturing two sets of images at the first visit. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland–Altman plots showed excellent repeatability between the two series of images (Additional file 2). Meanwhile, the repeatability from session to session was high, with ICCs varying from 0.918 to 0.992 for the pre-near work choroidal metrics. Additionally, no significant differences in pre-near work choroidal metrics were observed in both adults and children during the three visits (all P > 0.05, Additional files 3 and 4).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 27, IBM, NY, USA). The results are presented as mean ± SD wherever applicable. The Shapiro–Wilk's test was used to confirm that the data sets were normally distributed. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the effect of near work on choroidal metrics at different time points. When the assumption of sphericity was violated, the P value was adjusted with the Greenhouse–Geisser. Bonferroni adjustment was applied for pairwise comparison tests. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) was used to compare the magnitude of changes between the groups and time, adjusted for AL. P < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

Results

Demographics and ocular metrics of the studied participants

Thirty-one adults and 32 children participated in the study. One adult and two children dropped out of the study midway. Finally, 30 adults (12 males and 18 females) and 30 children (13 boys and 17 girls) with a mean age of 23.3 ± 2.3 years and 9.9 ± 1.0 years, respectively, were included in the analyses. The mean SER and AL of adults were − 3.50 ± 0.95 D (range: − 5.37 to − 1.62 D) and 25.00 ± 1.05 mm (range: 23.27 to 27.16 mm), respectively, while the mean SER and AL of children were − 2.00 ± 0.91 D (range: − 3.87 to − 0.50 D) and 24.56 ± 0.67 mm (range: 23.46 to 25.87 mm), respectively (Table 1). The corneal refractive power of adults and children were 43.54 ± 1.53 D (range: 39.98 to 46.21 D) and 43.11 ± 1.53 D (range: 40.27 to 46.42 D), respectively. The IOP of adults and children were 14.1 ± 2.7 mmHg (range: 8.1 to 20.1 mmHg) and 14.7 ± 2.7 mmHg (range: 10.0 to 19.3 mmHg), respectively. The mean amplitude of accommodation of adults was 11.0 ± 2.0 D (range: 7.0 to 15.0 D), which was 13.7 ± 2.5 D (range: 8.5 to 19.3 D) in children. The children showed higher SER and amplitude of accommodation (all P < 0.001), while other parameters were not significantly different between the two groups (all P > 0.05).

Table 1 Demographics and ocular metrics of the study population
Full size table

The baseline SFCT was 267.2 ± 68.6 μm in adults, and it was 255.9 ± 52.8 μm in children (Table 1). The submacular LA, SA and TCA in adults were (990.0 ± 229.3) × 103 μm2, (589.4 ± 113.7) × 103 μm2 and (1579.4 ± 331.8) × 103 μm2, respectively. The LA, SA and TCA in children were (919.6 ± 167.6) × 103 μm2, (587.8 ± 115.4) × 103 μm2, and (1507.4 ± 269.6) × 103 μm2, respectively. The CVI in adults was 62.45% ± 3.08%, which was 61.06% ± 2.90% in children. All the above parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. Only the CcFD was higher in adults than in children (8.41% ± 2.20% vs. 7.05% ± 1.33%, P = 0.019).

Influence of near work on choroidal metrics in adults

Near work for 20 min induced a significant decrease in SFCT (− 5.1 ± 6.5 μm, P < 0.001), as well as decreases in LA [(− 19.2 ± 18.6) × 103 μm2, P < 0.001], SA [(− 8.2 ± 12.6) × 103 μm2, P = 0.001] and TCA [(− 27.4 ± 24.9) × 103 μm2, P < 0.001], whereas no significant changes were observed for CVI and CcFD (Table 2, Additional file 3). After 40 min of near work, LA still declined [(− 9.4 ± 18.3) × 103 μm2, P = 0.009], as well as CVI (− 0.39% ± 0.70%, P = 0.005), and CcFD increased (0.30% ± 0.78%, P = 0.045). A significant decrease in CVI and increase in CcFD was also observed after 60 min of near work (CVI: − 0.28% ± 0.59%, P = 0.015; CcFD: 0.37% ± 0.75%, P = 0.012).

Table 2 Trend of choroidal metrics after near work
Full size table

Influence of near work on choroidal metrics in children

Compared to pre-near work values, CcFD increased significantly after 20 min of near work (0.55% ± 0.64%, P < 0.001), with no significant changes in SFCT, LA, SA, TCA and CVI (all P > 0.05, Table 2, Additional file 4). After 40 min of near work, we did not witness the above choroidal metrics changing significantly. After 60 min of near work, SA increased [(7.2 ± 13.0) × 103 μm2, P = 0.005], accompanied by an increase in TCA [(9.7 ± 25.3) × 103 μm2, P = 0.046] and a decrease in CVI (− 0.28% ± 0.72%, P = 0.040).

Differences in choroidal changes during near work between children and adults

The comparison of choroidal changes during near work were adjusted for AL and these changes were expressed as percentages, which were defined as the ratio of choroidal metrics at post-near work minus those at pre-near work.

Across all participants, the magnitude of SFCT, LA, SA and TCA changes varied significantly after 20, 40 and 60 min of near work (main effect: SFCT: P = 0.004; LA: P = 0.009; SA: P < 0.001; TCA: P < 0.001, Fig. 3, Additional file 5), with the greatest reduction seen at 20 min. Adults exhibited a greater reduction of 0.86% in LA changes than that observed in children (main effect: P = 0.017), as well as a greater reduction of 0.82% in TCA changes (main effect: P = 0.009). The changes in other choroidal metrics were not significantly different between the two age groups (all P > 0.05). The interactions between time and age group for all choroidal metrics were not significant (all P > 0.05).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Percentage changes of choroidal metrics during near work. Percentage changes of (a) subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), (b) luminal area (LA), (c) stromal area (SA), (d) total choroidal area (TCA), (e) choroidal vascularity index (CVI) and (f) choriocapillaris flow deficits (CcFD) during near work for children and adults

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, we studied the choroidal vasculature by analyzing the LA, SA and TCA, which indicated the vascularity of medium- and large-sized vessels layer, and CcFD, which indicated the choriocapillaris perfusion in response to near work. We identified that the temporal characteristics and magnitude of changes in different choroidal layers were different in children and adults. In adults, 20 min of near work decreased the SFCT, submacular LA, SA and TCA, while 40 min of near work decreased the LA and CVI and increased CcFD. After 60 min of near work, CVI was still decreased and CcFD was still increased. On the other hand, in children, 20 min of near work induced an increase in CcFD, while 60 min of near work increased the SA and TCA and decreased the CVI. The reduction in LA and TCA in children was lower than in adults.

Effect and temporal properties of near work on choroid

Studies on myopia and near work have traditionally aimed at the choroidal thickness changes to an accommodative stimulus [20, 23, 33]. Intensity and duration of near work can influence the magnitude of choroidal thickness changes. The choroid thinned significantly with a higher degree of accommodative stimulus. Choroidal thickness decreased with a 6.00 D stimulus at 10 min and 30 min [20, 23, 33], while no significant changes were observed with a 3.00 D stimulus during those periods [23,24,25]. A similar phenomenon was observed in animals reared under different visual environments with exposures to near, middle and long viewing distances [19]. Besides, the time course also influenced the choroidal thickness changes. In our study, choroidal thickness in adults showed a significant decrease in early stage (20 min) and then this reduction weakened. Similarly, Woodman et al. found choroidal thinning with − 4.00 D accommodation demand in early stages (5 to 10 min), then saw the reduction weakened progressively [22]. These changes in choroidal thickness indicated temporal effect of sustained accommodation was not simply a linear accumulation.

The studies on choroidal vascularity and blood flow signal in response to visual stimuli are limited. Pan et al. and Liang et al. found a significant increase in CcFD and a significant decrease in LA and CVI in young adults after 40 min of near work [24, 25], which was consistent with our results. Chang et al. showed that LA, SA and TCA significantly decreased in myopic children with additional − 3.00 D lenses on top of the fully corrected prescription lenses after 30 min of near work (about 6.00 D stimulus) [20]. However, in our study, the changes in LA, SA and TCA in children after 20 and 40 min of near work did not reach statistical significance. This may be because our 3.00 D stimulus was not adequate to induce similar magnitudes of changes as the 6.00 D stimulus. Furthermore, no significant changes in choriocapillaris perfusion were found in their study, while a significant reduction was observed in children in our study after 20 min of near work. This difference may be attributed to the different raster scan protocol that covers an area of 3 mm × 3 mm in our study as opposed to 6 mm × 6 mm used in their study. Overall, our data suggest that changes in medium- and large-sized vascular layers and the choriocapillaris layer responding to the near work might not be synchronous in the temporal characteristics.

The difference in choroidal response to near work

Our results showed that the choroidal responses to near work in children and adults were different in temporal pattern and magnitude. The initial response to near work was observed in choriocapillaris in children, whereas it was mainly in the medium- and large-sized vessel layers in adults. As the choroid lies behind the RPE layer and cannot respond readily to retinal metabolic or neurovascular signals, retinal activity-dependent regulation of choroidal blood flow is mediated by retinal input to central autonomic circuits [17, 34]. The changes in medium- and large-sized vessel layers may be due to neuronal control since parasympathetic, sympathetic, and sensory fibers and their terminals tend to be localized to the walls of the arteries and veins of the choroid, not the choriocapillaris layer [34]. Intrinsic choroidal neurons (ICNs) probably also play a role in choroidal blood flow as putative targets innervated by ICNs are arteries and nonvascular smooth muscle fibers [35, 36]. However, because sympathetic, parasympathetic and sensory fibers end at the subcapillary level, instead of the choriocapillaris level, the changes in choriocapillaris perfusion may be regulated indirectly by the incoming/outgoing choroidal blood flow [37].

The difference in choroidal responses between children and adults may be ascribed to the effect of development, including choroidal vascularity, innervation and non-vascular smooth muscle. Though relevant studies on choroid in children and young adults are scarce, some studies highlighted the difference in choroidal morphometrics [38], choroidal perfusion [29, 39, 40], endothelial cells [41,42,43], choroidal nerve fibers [44,45,46], and non-vascular smooth muscle in aging [47]. In summary, it is evident from our data that the choroidal responses vary among the two age groups. Further studies are warranted to narrow down the factors mediating these differences.

Limitations

The limitations of this study include lack of data on choroidal metrics at time points earlier than 20 min. Shorter durations of near work and continuous monitoring would provide a better understanding of choroidal changes. Another possible limitation could be that the study was performed in myopic eyes rather than emmetropic eyes. It was reported that the choroidal thickness changes in response to accommodative stimuli vary between myopes and emmetropes, with little choroidal responses to accommodation in emmetropes [20, 22]. Whether the difference we found exists in emmetropic eyes warrants further studies. In this study, AL varied greatly, reflecting the difference in ocular structure between children and adults. This difference may probably reflect on their choroidal vasculature as the choroid thinning is accompanied by ocular elongation [48, 49]. Therefore, we adjusted for AL and calculated the percentage changes of choroidal metrics to reduce the influences. Meanwhile, we acknowledge that non-cycloplegic subjective refraction could result in a more myopic refractive error than a cycloplegic autorefraction [50]. We employed subjective refraction mainly to obtain a full correction prescription for the reading task, hence this method was preferred over a cycloplegic refraction [51, 52].

Conclusions

Choroidal vascularity and choriocapillaris perfusion responded differently to near work in children and young adults. The responses to near work were not identical in temporal characteristics and magnitude of changes. The initial response to near work was observed in the choriocapillaris in children, whereas its was observed in the medium- and large-sized vessels in adults. Overall, this study provides new insights on varying responses of different choroidal components to near work in different age groups.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AL:

Axial length

BCVA:

Best corrected visual acuity

BM:

Bruch’s membrane

CcFD:

Choriocapillaris flow deficit

CVI:

Choroidal vascularity index

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

IOP:

Intraocular pressure

LA:

Luminal area

OCT:

Optical coherence tomography

OCTA:

Optical coherence tomography angiography

RPE:

Retinal pigment epithelium

SA:

Stromal area

SER:

Spherical equivalent refraction

SFCT:

Subfoveal choroidal thickness

SS-OCT:

Swept-source optical coherence tomography

TCA:

Total choroidal area

References

  1. Huang PC, Hsiao YC, Tsai CY, Tsai DC, Chen CW, Hsu CC, et al. Protective behaviours of near work and time outdoors in myopia prevalence and progression in myopic children: a 2-year prospective population study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(7):956–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee SS, Lingham G, Sanfilippo PG, Hammond CJ, Saw SM, Guggenheim JA, et al. Incidence and progression of myopia in early adulthood. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022;140(2):162–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lv L, Zhang Z. Pattern of myopia progression in Chinese medical students: a two-year follow-up study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(1):163–8.

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Li SM, Wei S, Atchison DA, Kang MT, Liu L, Li H, et al. Annual incidences and progressions of myopia and high myopia in Chinese schoolchildren based on a 5-year cohort study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022;63(1):8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hsu CC, Huang N, Lin PY, Fang SY, Tsai DC, Chen SY, et al. Risk factors for myopia progression in second-grade primary school children in Taipei: a population-based cohort study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(12):1611–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ducloux A, Marillet S, Ingrand P, Bullimore MA, Bourne RRA, Leveziel N. Progression of myopia in teenagers and adults: a nationwide longitudinal study of a prevalent cohort. Br J Ophthalmol. 2023;107(5):644–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wallman J, Adams JI. Developmental aspects of experimental myopia in chicks: susceptibility, recovery and relation to emmetropization. Vision Res. 1987;27(7):1139–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wiesel TN, Raviola E. Myopia and eye enlargement after neonatal lid fusion in monkeys. Nature. 1977;266(5597):66–8.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ, Alonso-Caneiro D. Choroidal thickness in childhood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(5):3586–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xiong S, He X, Deng J, Lv M, Jin J, Sun S, et al. Choroidal thickness in 3001 Chinese children aged 6 to 19 years using swept-source OCT. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45059.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bidaut-Garnier M, Schwartz C, Puyraveau M, Montard M, Delbosc B, Saleh M. Choroidal thickness measurement in children using optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2014;34(4):768–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Margolis R, Spaide RF. A pilot study of enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in normal eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147(5):811–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ding X, Li J, Zeng J, Ma W, Liu R, Li T, et al. Choroidal thickness in healthy Chinese subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(13):9555–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Y, Liu M, Xie Z, Wang P, Li X, Yao X, et al. Choroidal circulation in 8- to 30-year-old Chinese, measured by SS-OCT/OCTA: relations to age, axial length, and choroidal thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023;64(7):7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruiz-Medrano J, Ruiz-Moreno JM, Goud A, Vupparaboina KK, Jana S, Chhablani J. Age-related changes in choroidal vascular density of healthy subjects based on image binarization of swept-source optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2018;38(3):508–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lal B, Alonso-Caneiro D, Read SA, Carkeet A. Changes in retinal and choroidal optical coherence tomography angiography indices among young adults and children over 1 year. Clin Exp Optom. 2023:1–8.

  17. Nickla DL, Wallman J. The multifunctional choroid. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29(2):144–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Read SA, Fuss JA, Vincent SJ, Collins MJ, Alonso-Caneiro D. Choroidal changes in human myopia: insights from optical coherence tomography imaging. Clin Exp Optom. 2019;102(3):270–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fu Q, Zhang Y, Chen L, Dong M, Tang W, Chen S, et al. Near work induces myopia in guinea pigs. Exp Eye Res. 2022;224: 109202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang X, Li M, Lv L, Yan X, Liu Y, Zhu M, et al. Assessment of choroidal vascularity and choriocapillaris blood perfusion after accommodation in myopia, emmetropia, and hyperopia groups among children. Front Physiol. 2022;13:854240.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghosh A, Collins MJ, Read SA, Davis BA, Chatterjee P. Axial elongation associated with biomechanical factors during near work. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(3):322–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Woodman EC, Read SA, Collins MJ. Axial length and choroidal thickness changes accompanying prolonged accommodation in myopes and emmetropes. Vis Res. 2012;72:34–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Woodman-Pieterse EC, Read SA, Collins MJ, Alonso-Caneiro D. Regional changes in choroidal thickness associated with accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(11):6414–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pan M, Zhao F, Xie B, Wu H, Zhang S, Ye C, et al. Dietary ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are protective for myopia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(43):e2104689118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liang X, Wei S, Zhao S, Li SM, An W, Sun Y, et al. Investigation of choroidal blood flow and thickness changes induced by near work in young adults. Curr Eye Res. 2023;48(10):939–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen S, Zheng G, Yu X, Jiang Y, Lin Z, Lin G, et al. Impact of penetration and image analysis in optical coherence tomography on the measurement of choroidal vascularity parameters. Retina. 2022;42(10):1965–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zheng G, Jiang Y, Shi C, Miao H, Yu X, Wang Y, et al. Deep learning algorithms to segment and quantify the choroidal thickness and vasculature in swept-source optical coherence tomography images. J Innov Opt Health Sci. 2021;14(01):2140002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Agrawal R, Gupta P, Tan KA, Cheung CM, Wong TY, Cheng CY. Choroidal vascularity index as a measure of vascular status of the choroid: measurements in healthy eyes from a population-based study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21090.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sonoda S, Sakamoto T, Yamashita T, Uchino E, Kawano H, Yoshihara N, et al. Luminal and stromal areas of choroid determined by binarization method of optical coherence tomographic images. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(6):1123–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chu Z, Zhang Q, Gregori G, Rosenfeld PJ, Wang RK. Guidelines for imaging the choriocapillaris using OCT angiography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;222:92–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang Q, Zheng F, Motulsky EH, Gregori G, Chu Z, Chen CL, et al. A novel strategy for quantifying choriocapillaris flow voids using swept-source OCT angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(1):203–11.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dai Y, Xin C, Zhang Q, Chu Z, Zhou H, Zhou X, et al. Impact of ocular magnification on retinal and choriocapillaris blood flow quantification in myopia with swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021;11(3):948–56.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhao F, Zhang D, Zhou Q, Zhao F, He M, Yang Z, et al. Scleral HIF-1α is a prominent regulatory candidate for genetic and environmental interactions in human myopia pathogenesis. EBioMedicine. 2020;57:102878.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Reiner A, Fitzgerald MEC, Del Mar N, Li C. Neural control of choroidal blood flow. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018;64:96–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schrödl F, De Laet A, Tassignon MJ, Van Bogaert PP, Brehmer A, Neuhuber WL, et al. Intrinsic choroidal neurons in the human eye: projections, targets, and basic electrophysiological data. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(9):3705–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. McDougal DH, Gamlin PD. Autonomic control of the eye. Compr Physiol. 2015;5(1):439–73.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lejoyeux R, Benillouche J, Ong J, Errera MH, Rossi EA, Singh SR, et al. Choriocapillaris: fundamentals and advancements. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2022;87:100997.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ramrattan RS, van der Schaft TL, Mooy CM, de Bruijn WC, Mulder PG, de Jong PT. Morphometric analysis of Bruch’s membrane, the choriocapillaris, and the choroid in aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35(6):2857–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cheng W, Song Y, Lin F, Jin L, Wang Z, Jonas JB, et al. Choriocapillaris flow deficits in normal Chinese imaged by swept-source optical coherence tomographic angiography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;235:143–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zheng F, Zhang Q, Shi Y, Russell JF, Motulsky EH, Banta JT, et al. Age-dependent changes in the macular choriocapillaris of normal eyes imaged with swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;200:110–22.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sohn EH, Flamme-Wiese MJ, Whitmore SS, Wang K, Tucker BA, Mullins RF. Loss of CD34 expression in aging human choriocapillaris endothelial cells. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86538.

    Article  ADS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Voigt AP, Whitmore SS, Mulfaul K, Chirco KR, Giacalone JC, Flamme-Wiese MJ, et al. Bulk and single-cell gene expression analyses reveal aging human choriocapillaris has pro-inflammatory phenotype. Microvasc Res. 2020;131:104031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hageman GS, Zhu XL, Waheed A, Sly WS. Localization of carbonic anhydrase IV in a specific capillary bed of the human eye. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(7):2716–20.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jablonski MM, Iannaccone A, Reynolds DH, Gallaher P, Allen S, Wang X, et al. Age-related decline in VIP-positive parasympathetic nerve fibers in the human submacular choroid. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(2):479–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nuzzi R, Finazzo C, Grignolo FM. Changes in adrenergic innervation of the choroid during aging. J Fr Ophtalmol. 1996;19(2):89–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. May CA, Lütjen-Drecoll E. Choroidal ganglion cells in prenatal, young, and middle-aged human donor eyes. Curr Eye Res. 2005;30(8):667–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. May CA. Non-vascular smooth muscle cells in the human choroid: distribution, development and further characterization. J Anat. 2005;207(4):381–90.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Read SA, Alonso-Caneiro D, Vincent SJ, Collins MJ. Longitudinal changes in choroidal thickness and eye growth in childhood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(5):3103–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Xiong S, He X, Zhang B, Deng J, Wang J, Lv M, et al. Changes in choroidal thickness varied by age and refraction in children and adolescents: a 1-year longitudinal study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;213:46–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Asharlous A, Soroush S, Yekta A, Dadbin N, et al. Cycloplegic autorefraction versus subjective refraction: the Tehran Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(8):1122–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wolffsohn JS, Kollbaum PS, Berntsen DA, Atchison DA, Benavente A, Bradley A, et al. IMI—clinical myopia control trials and instrumentation report. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(3):M132–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Jacobs DS, Afshari NA, Bishop RJ, Keenan JD, Lee J, Shen TT, et al. Refractive Errors Preferred Practice Pattern®. Ophthalmology. 2023;130(3):P1-60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank William K. Stell (Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada) for helping with the data analysis and providing editorial support for improving the manuscript.

Funding

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82000931 and 82025009), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (Grant No. 2019-I2M-5-048).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xiangtian Zhou and Hao Wu contributed equally and should be considered co-last authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China

    Mengqi Liu, Yuanyuan Wang, Haoer Li, Yunpeng Zhao, Min Ma, Shihan Xu, Xiaohuan Wei, Ruiyan Xu, Ruikang Tian, Xiangtian Zhou & Hao Wu

  2. State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Visual Science, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China

    Mengqi Liu, Yuanyuan Wang, Haoer Li, Yunpeng Zhao, Min Ma, Shihan Xu, Xiaohuan Wei, Ruiyan Xu, Ruikang Tian, Xiangtian Zhou & Hao Wu

  3. Research Unit of Myopia Basic Research and Clinical Prevention and Control, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019RU025), Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China

    Xiangtian Zhou

Authors
  1. Mengqi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuanyuan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haoer Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yunpeng Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Min Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shihan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiaohuan Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ruiyan Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ruikang Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xiangtian Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Hao Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HW and XZ designed the study. ML, YW, HL, YZ, MM, SX, XW, RX and RT performed the study. ML analyzed data and drafted the manuscript. HW and XZ acquired funding. The guarantor: HW. HW and XZ contributed equally as co-last authors. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiangtian Zhou or Hao Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (approval ID: 2020-173-K-158-01). All participants gave informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Illustration of the time course of the experiments.

Additional file 2.

Bland-Altman plots for differences of choroidal metrics between the two serials of images captured consecutively.

Additional file 3.

Choroidal metrics of pre- and post-near work in adults (n=30).

Additional file 4.

Choroidal metrics of pre- and post-near work in children (n=30).

Additional file 5.

Percentage changes of choroidal metrics during near work.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, M., Wang, Y., Li, H. et al. Differences in choroidal responses to near work between myopic children and young adults. Eye and Vis 11, 12 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-024-00382-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-024-00382-5

Keywords

Eye and Vision

ISSN: 2326-0254