Open Access

PACK-CXL: Corneal cross-linking in infectious keratitis

Eye and Vision20163:11

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0042-x

Received: 24 September 2015

Accepted: 24 March 2016

Published: 19 April 2016

Abstract

Background

Corneal cross-linking (CXL) using ultraviolet light-A (UV-A) and riboflavin is a technique developed in the 1990’s to treat corneal ectatic disorders such as keratoconus. It soon became the new gold standard in multiple countries around the world to halt the progression of this disorder, with good long-term outcomes in keratometry reading and visual acuity. The original Dresden treatment protocol was also later on used to stabilize iatrogenic corneal ectasia appearing after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). CXL efficiently strengthened the cornea but was also shown to kill most of the keratocytes within the corneal stroma, later on repopulated by those cells.

Review

Ultraviolet-light has long been known for its microbicidal effect, and thus CXL postulated to be able to sterilize the cornea from infectious pathogens. This cytotoxic effect led to the first clinical trials using CXL to treat advanced infectious melting corneal keratitis. Patients treated with this technique showed, in the majority of cases, a stabilization of the melting process and were able to avoid emergent à chaud keratoplasty. Following those primary favorable results, CXL was used to treat beginning bacterial keratitis as a first-line treatment without any adjunctive antibiotics with positive results for most patients. In order to distinguish the use of CXL for infectious keratitis treatment from its use for corneal ectatic disorders, a new term was proposed at the 9th CXL congress in Dublin to rename its use in infections as photoactivated chromophore for infectious keratitis -corneal collagen cross-linking (PACK-CXL).

Conclusion

PACK-CXL is now more frequently used to treat infections from various infectious origins. The original Dresden protocol is still used for this purpose. Careful modifications of this protocol could improve the efficiency of this technique in specific clinical situations regarding certain types of pathogens.

Keywords

Infectious Keratitis Corneal cross-linking Keratoconus CXL PACK-CXL Corneal ulcer Ultraviolet light A Riboflavin

Background

The management of corneal ectatic disorder was completely transformed this past decade through the development and rise of the corneal cross-linking (CXL) technique in many academic and non-academic clinical settings around the world. Originally developed in Europe, more precisely in Germany and Switzerland, CXL proposed a new therapeutic alternative to patients with progressive keratoconus with the option of stabilizing the disease through a one-time extra-ocular surgical treatment [1, 2]. Easy to perform and efficient after one treatment, this technique became the benchmark for the treatment of progressive keratoconus. With this initial success, the technique was later adapted to treat iatrogenic corneal ectatic disorders [3, 4], bullous keratopathy [5, 6], and melting corneal ulcerations [7]. Initially, only advanced cases of corneal keratitis were treated, but more recently, beginning infections are also responding positively to CXL (Fig. 1, a-d). The number of publications reporting successful treatment of infectious keratitis with CXL is increasing. CXL could become a new alternative to standard treatment of infectious keratitis in the future.
Fig. 1

Pre- and post-treatment peripheral infectious keratitis. a Anterior segment photography of a patient with early peripheral infectious keratitis (arrow). b Anterior segment OCT of the lesion. c Anterior segment photography of the same patient 7 days after PACK-CXL (9 mW/cm2 irradiance for 10 min) with resolution of the peripheral infectious keratitis (arrow). d Anterior segment OCT of the lesion at day 7 after PACK-CXL

Review

CXL for corneal ectasia

CXL was initially developed to treat progressing corneal ectatic disorders such as keratoconus. The idea is to artificially strengthen the cornea biomechanically in order to stop the progression of the disease through the combination of ultraviolet light and a photo-reactant within the corneal stroma. The method was initially developed by Theo Seiler, Eberhard Spoerl, and Gregor Wollensak. Their first report tested this hypothesis ex vivo on porcine corneas and obtained good results, later confirmed in vivo in rabbits and ex vivo on human corneas [2, 810]. The first clinical trial was published in 2003 treating 23 eyes with CXL, stabilizing the disease in all patients [1].

CXL was performed using the combination of ultraviolet light type A (UV-A) and vitamin B2 (also known as riboflavin). The original Dresden protocol mentions that the epithelium is mechanically removed, followed by application of a 0.1 % riboflavin solution [11]. Once the corneal stroma is soaked with riboflavin, UV-A light (365 nm) is used to irradiate the cornea for 30 min (3 mW/cm2 irradiance). Riboflavin is a photo-reacting molecule, which produces free radicals within the corneal stroma when photoactivated. These free radicals interact with the local collagen and proteoglycan molecules to create new covalent bonds and thus strengthen the overall biomechanical resistance of the cornea. Laboratory testing on human corneas reported an increase in corneal rigidity by an average of 300 % after this protocol [2]. Some caution was taken when performing this surgery as only cornea thicker than 400 μm without the epithelium were treated in order to avoid damage to the endothelium [11]. Specific protocols have since been developed to address the issue of thin corneas using a hypo-osmolaric riboflavin solution [12, 13]. This surgery has now been proven to be efficient in the long term with excellent results of disease stabilization over 10 years, and reduces the need of corneal transplant in this population [1317]. Further, it not only stops the progression of the disease in adults and in children [1820], but also flattens the keratometry readings in some [1, 16]. Under certain circumstances, however, even CXL fails to stabilize the biomechanically weakened cornea, i.e. in pregnancy [21].

This first accomplishment of halting the progression of keratoconus using CXL led to another application of this technology. CXL was used to treat iatrogenic corneal ectatic disorders developed after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) [3, 4]. In clinical trials, CXL stabilized Kmax values, improved corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and proved to be an efficient treatment for those rare postoperative complications [3, 4, 2224].

A new field to explore

Very early in the history of CXL, another field was explored where the concept of CXL could also be applied. In 2000, Seiler and his team reported the use of CXL for advanced non-infectious corneal melting [25]. This pilot trial treated four patients with corneal melting of various non-infectious origins [25]. The rationale was that an increase in covalent bonds amongst the collagen molecules might help stabilize the disease and avoid any à chaud corneal surgery in these patients. Of four patients, three showed stabilization of the melting process after CXL, whereas the last patient continued to progress despite treatment. From this pilot data, it was concluded that CXL could, in some cases, stabilize the cornea even though a pathological process had already modified its structure.

PACK-CXL for keratitis

The treatment of advance corneal melting came back into clinical perspective 8 years later with a clinical trial from Iseli and colleagues where therapy-resistant cases of melting corneas were treated with CXL. This time, every case was of infectious origin [7]. In this small cohort study, five patients with advanced corneal melt of infectious origin were selected. Two patients presented a fungal keratitis, whereas the other three were infected with Mycobacterium spp. pathogen. Each patient presented a disease unresponsive to full topical and systemic microbicidal therapy. They received CXL with the standard Dresden protocol technique: 3 mW/cm2 CXL for 30 min [2, 7]. After surgery, the melting process was halted in four out of five patients. The last patient showed a persistent corneal melt caused by an immune reaction without any remaining active pathogen. This study not only confirmed the previous results from Seiler and colleagues from the year 2000, but also introduced the concept that CXL might be efficient when treating corneal melts from an infectious origin. Subsequently, further clinical trials on advanced melting corneas, one meta-analysis, and multiple animal experiments confirmed those initial results [20, 2653].

The next step after treating therapy-resistant cases of advanced infectious keratitis was to treat early cases with CXL. Thus in 2011, Makdoumi and colleagues from Sweden proposed a prospective non-randomized clinical trial to investigate the efficiency of CXL as first line therapy in bacterial keratitis [35]. They recruited 16 patients clinically diagnosed with infectious bacterial keratitis who had not received any previous antibiotic (topical or systemic) treatment. All patients were treated with standard CXL as mentioned in the Dresden protocol (3 mw/cm2 for 30 min with 0.1 % riboflavin) [1]. Of 16 patients, 15 showed complete epithelial closure and all showed signs of improvement and reduction of inflammatory response to the bacteria. Nevertheless, two patients needed additional antibiotic therapy to treat their disease [35]. The Swedish team uncovered the microbicidal effect of CXL in early bacterial keratitis as a first-line treatment in this trial.

CXL has been shown to be an efficient treatment stabilizing not only advanced melting corneal ulcers, but also early infectious keratitis of bacterial origin over a 10-year period [26, 37, 41, 4447, 54]. Photoactivated chromophore for keratitis-corneal collagen cross-linking (PACK-CXL) has a very good healing rate regarding bacteria (average 88 %) as reported in a recent meta-analysis and most of the clinical trials are reporting a successful treatment rate when using PACK-CXL in combination with standard antimicrobial therapy [55]. Regarding fungal infections, healing rates are also good (average 78 %). Some of those infections healed with an additional intervention after PACK-CXL. Healing rate might be different when using PACK-CXL alone and further clinical trials are needed to study this issue. Regarding acanthamoeba keratitis, 10 out of 11 cases healed, five of them with retreatment. Although this meta-analysis reports good healing rates for acanthamoeba keratitis, caution should be taken in monitoring patients as almost half of them needed retreatment [55]. More complicated clinical situations were also addressed in few reports using PACK-CXL to treat combined pathological situations with infectious keratitis such as bullous keratopathy or late-onset infections of a corneal graft [56, 57].

Riboflavin and ultraviolet light have been used for decades to kill pathogens, in combination or separately (surface and water disinfection, blood sterilization prior to transfusion, etc.). Therefore, the microbicidal effect of CXL can be explained through the effect of these two elements. First, ultraviolet (UV) light itself has a strong antimicrobial activity as it directly damages DNA and RNA in microbes such as bacteria, but also viruses, and inhibits microbes from replicating [5861]. Riboflavin also possesses its own microbicidal effect. When it is photoactivated, it releases reactive oxygen species (ROS) that directly interact with the nucleic acids and cell membranes of the microbe [62, 63]. The combined effect of UV-A light and riboflavin has been shown to be superior than their separate effect, with a 10-fold increased cytotoxicity when compared to UV-A alone [58, 64].

With the increasing number of publications on CXL to treat infectious keratitis, a new terminology regarding this specific use was proposed at the 9th International Cross-Linking Congress in 2013. It aims to distinguish CXL for infections from CXL for corneal ectasia in order to avoid confusion in scientific publications and protocols. The term PACK-CXL: Photo-Activated Chromophore for Keratitis – Corneal Cross-Linking was adopted for CXL when treating infectious keratitis [31].

Conclusion

CXL was initially developed to stabilize keratoconus. The Dresden protocol was developed after abundant laboratory research including animal trials. This protocol was tailored to only treat cornea with an ectatic disorder and to protect the endothelium, avoiding any other complication. As a safe protocol it was used when applying CXL to other diseases in order to avoid any non-desirable postoperative effect, and most studies continue using it for PACK-CXL as originally established. Our group recently demonstrated that an optimization of the protocol’s parameters allows reducing the treatment time without impairing its killing rate on bacterial strains [43]. Already in the literature, some report successful treatment of accelerated protocols in humans and animals [50, 65]. PACK-CXL follows the Bunsen-Roscoe law of reciprocity and accelerated PACK-CXL could be clinically efficient compared to the standard Dresden protocol with careful modifications of the protocol regarding the pathogen type (bacteria, fungus, amoeba) in order to maintain an appropriate killing rate [50, 65, 66].

PACK-CXL now needs further protocol modifications to tailor the treatment to a specific pathogen or clinical situation. Adjustments of treatment parameters such as irradiation duration, type of chromophore, and fluence used might help increase the microbicidal efficiency of PACK-CXL depending on the type of pathogen. With the possible development of PACK-CXL treating early keratitis and beginning infiltrates, the need for a more cost effective method will be necessary. Cheaper, lighter and smaller devices could support the use of PACK-CXL for early infectious keratitis and help reduce the burden of multi-drug-resistant pathogens and patient’s compliance in those clinical situations.

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory for Ocular Cell Biology, University of Geneva
(2)
Siena Crosslinking Center, Siena University Hospital
(3)
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Southern California
(4)
EyeCare Laboratory Research Zurich Associates (ELZA) Institute
(5)
Department of Ophthalmology, Northampton General Hospital

References

  1. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(5):620–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Stress–strain measurements of human and porcine corneas after riboflavin-ultraviolet-A-induced cross-linking. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(9):1780–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hafezi F, Kanellopoulos J, Wiltfang R, Seiler T. Corneal collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet A to treat induced keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(12):2035–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Richoz O, Mavrakanas N, Pajic B, Hafezi F. Corneal collagen cross-linking for ectasia after LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: long-term results. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(7):1354–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ehlers N, Hjortdal J, Nielsen K, Søndergaard A. Riboflavin-UVA treatment in the management of edema and nonhealing ulcers of the cornea. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(9):S803–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hafezi F, Dejica P, Majo F. Modified corneal collagen crosslinking reduces corneal oedema and diurnal visual fluctuations in Fuchs dystrophy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(5):660–1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Iseli HP, Thiel MA, Hafezi F, Kampmeier J, Seiler T. Ultraviolet A/riboflavin corneal cross-linking for infectious keratitis associated with corneal melts. Cornea. 2008;27(5):590–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Spörl E, Huhle M, Kasper M, Seiler T. Increased rigidity of the cornea caused by intrastromal cross-linking. Ophthalmologe. 1997;94(12):902–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Spoerl E, Huhle M, Seiler T. Induction of cross-links in corneal tissue. Exp Eye Res. 1998;66(1):97–103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Spörl E, Schreiber J, Hellmund K, Seiler T, Knuschke P. Studies on the stabilization of the cornea in rabbits. Ophthalmologe. 2000;97(3):203–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Wilsch M, Seiler T. Endothelial cell damage after riboflavin-ultraviolet-A treatment in the rabbit. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(9):1786–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hafezi F. Limitation of collagen cross-linking with hypoosmolar riboflavin solution: failure in an extremely thin cornea. Cornea. 2011;30(8):917–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hafezi F, Mrochen M, Iseli HP, Seiler T. Collagen crosslinking with ultraviolet-A and hypoosmolar riboflavin solution in thin corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(4):621–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gkika M, Labiris G, Kozobolis V. Corneal collagen cross-linking using riboflavin and ultraviolet-A irradiation: a review of clinical and experimental studies. Int Ophthalmol. 2011;31(4):309–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kolli S, Aslanides IM. Safety and efficacy of collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2010;9(6):949–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Raiskup F, Theuring A, Pillunat LE, Spoerl E. Corneal collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in progressive keratoconus: ten-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(1):41–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Raiskup-Wolf F, Hoyer A, Spoerl E, Pillunat LE. Collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in keratoconus: long-term results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(5):796–801.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Caporossi A, Mazzotta C, Baiocchi S, Caporossi T, Denaro R, Balestrazzi A. Riboflavin-UVA-induced corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric patients. Cornea. 2012;31(3):227–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chatzis N, Hafezi F. Progression of keratoconus and efficacy of pediatric corneal collagen cross-linking in children and adolescents. J Refract Surg. 2012;28(11):753–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Vinciguerra R, Rosetta P, Romano MR, Azzolini C, Vinciguerra P. Treatment of refractory infectious keratitis with corneal collagen cross-linking window absorption. Cornea. 2013;32(6):e139–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hafezi F, Iseli HP. Pregnancy-related exacerbation of iatrogenic keratectasia despite corneal collagen crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(7):1219–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kohlhaas M, Spoerl E, Speck A, Schilde T, Sandner D, Pillunat LE. A new treatment of keratectasia after LASIK by using collagen with riboflavin/UVA light cross-linking. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2005;222(5):430–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mackool RJ. Crosslinking for iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK and for keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(6):879. author reply 879.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Salgado JP, Khoramnia R, Lohmann CP. Winkler von Mohrenfels C. Corneal collagen crosslinking in post-LASIK keratectasia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(4):493–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Schnitzler E, Spörl E, Seiler T. Irradiation of cornea with ultraviolet light and riboflavin administration as a new treatment for erosive corneal processes, preliminary results in four patients. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2000;217(3):190–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Abbouda A, Estrada AV, Rodriguez AE, Alió JL. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography in evaluation of severe fungal keratitis infections treated by corneal crosslinking. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014;24(3):320–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Alio JL, Abbouda A, Valle DD, Del Castillo JM, Fernandez JA. Corneal cross linking and infectious keratitis: a systematic review with a meta-analysis of reported cases. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2013;3(1):47.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Berra M, Galperin G, Boscaro G, Zarate J, Tau J, Chiaradia P, et al. Treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis by corneal cross-linking. Cornea. 2013;32(2):174–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. del Buey MA, Cristóbal JA, Casas P, Goñi P, Clavel A, Mínguez E, et al. Evaluation of in vitro efficacy of combined riboflavin and ultraviolet a for Acanthamoeba isolates. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(3):399–404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Galperin G, Berra M, Tau J, Boscaro G, Zarate J, Berra A. Treatment of fungal keratitis from Fusarium infection by corneal cross-linking. Cornea. 2012;31(2):176–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hafezi F, Randleman JB. PACK-CXL: defining CXL for infectious keratitis. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(7):438–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hellander-Edman A, Makdoumi K, Mortensen J, Ekesten B. Corneal cross-linking in 9 horses with ulcerative keratitis. BMC Vet Res. 2013;9:128.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Li Z, Jhanji V, Tao X, Yu H, Chen W, Mu G. Riboflavin/ultravoilet light-mediated crosslinking for fungal keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(5):669–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Makdoumi K, Mortensen J, Crafoord S. Infectious keratitis treated with corneal crosslinking. Cornea. 2010;29(12):1353–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Makdoumi K, Mortensen J, Sorkhabi O, Malmvall BE, Crafoord S. UVA-riboflavin photochemical therapy of bacterial keratitis: a pilot study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250(1):95–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mattila JS, Korsbäck A, Krootila K, Holopainen JM. Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis with combined corneal cross-linking and human amniotic membrane transplantation. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(5):e410–1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Müller L, Thiel MA, Kipfer-Kauer AI, Kaufmann C. Corneal cross-linking as supplementary treatment option in melting keratitis: a case series. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2012;229(4):411–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Panda A, Krishna SN, Kumar S. Photo-activated riboflavin therapy of refractory corneal ulcers. Cornea. 2012;31(10):1210–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Pot SA, Gallhöfer NS, Matheis FL, Voelter-Ratson K, Hafezi F, Spiess BM. Corneal collagen cross-linking as treatment for infectious and noninfectious corneal melting in cats and dogs: results of a prospective, nonrandomized, controlled trial. Vet Ophthalmol. 2014;17(4):250–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pot SA, Gallhöfer NS, Walser-Reinhardt L, Hafezi F, Spiess BM. Treatment of bullous keratopathy with corneal collagen cross-linking in two dogs. Vet Ophthalmol. 2015;18(2):168–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Price MO, Tenkman LR, Schrier A, Fairchild KM, Trokel SL, Price Jr FW. Photoactivated riboflavin treatment of infectious keratitis using collagen cross-linking technology. J Refract Surg. 2012;28(10):706–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Richoz O, Gatzioufas Z, Hafezi F. Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for the Treatment of Acanthamoeba Keratitis. Cornea. 2013;32(10), e189.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Richoz O, Kling S, Hoogewoud F, Hammer A, Tabibian D, Francois P, et al. Antibacterial efficacy of accelerated photoactivated chromophore for keratitis-corneal collagen cross-linking (PACK-CXL). J Refract Surg. 2014;30(12):850–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Sağlk A, Ucakhan OO, Kanpolat A. Ultraviolet A and riboflavin therapy as an adjunct in corneal ulcer refractory to medical treatment. Eye Contact Lens. 2013;39(6):413–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Said DG, Elalfy MS, Gatzioufas Z, El-Zakzouk ES, Hassan MA, Saif MY, et al. Collagen cross-linking with photoactivated riboflavin (PACK-CXL) for the treatment of advanced infectious keratitis with corneal melting. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(7):1377–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Shetty R, Nagaraja H, Jayadev C, Shivanna Y, Kugar T. Collagen crosslinking in the management of advanced non-resolving microbial keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(8):1033–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Sorkhabi R, Sedgipoor M, Mahdavifard A. Collagen cross-linking for resistant corneal ulcer. Int Ophthalmol. 2013;33(1):61–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Spiess BM, Pot SA, Florin M, Hafezi F. Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) for the treatment of melting keratitis in cats and dogs: a pilot study. Vet Ophthalmol. 2014;17(1):1–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Tabibian D, Richoz O, Hafezi F. PACK-CXL: Corneal Cross-linking for Treatment of Infectious Keratitis. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2015;10(1):77–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Tabibian D, Richoz O, Riat A, Schrenzel J, Hafezi F. Accelerated photoactivated chromophore for keratitis-corneal collagen cross-linking as a first-line and sole treatment in early fungal keratitis. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(12):855–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Vazirani J, Vaddavalli PK. Cross-linking for microbial keratitis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61(8):441–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Wong RL, Gangwani RA, Yu LW, Lai JS. New treatments for bacterial keratitis. J Ophthalmol. 2012;2012:831502.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang ZY. Corneal cross-linking for the treatment of fungal keratitis. Cornea. 2013;32(2):217–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Vajpayee RB, Shafi SN, Maharana PK, Sharma N, Jhanji V. Evaluation of corneal collagen cross-linking as an additional therapy in mycotic keratitis. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2015;43(2):103–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Papaioannou L, Miligkos M, Papathanassiou M. Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Infectious Keratitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cornea. 2015;35(1):62–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Labiris G, Giarmoukakis A, Larin R, Sideroudi H, Kozobolis VP. Corneal collagen cross-linking in a late-onset graft infectious ulcer: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014;8:180.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Kozobolis V, Labiris G, Gkika M, Sideroudi H, Kaloghianni E, Papadopoulou D, et al. UV-A Collagen Cross-Linking Treatment of Bullous Keratopathy Combined With Corneal Ulcer. Cornea. 2010;29(2):235–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Martins SA, Combs JC, Noguera G, Camacho W, Wittmann P, Walther R, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of riboflavin/UVA combination (365 nm) in vitro for bacterial and fungal isolates: a potential new treatment for infectious keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(8):3402–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Naseem I, Ahmad M, Hadi SM. Effect of alkylated and intercalated DNA on the generation of superoxide anion by riboflavin. Biosci Rep. 1988;8(5):485–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Pileggi G, Wataha JC, Girard M, Grad I, Schrenzel J, Lange N, et al. Blue light-mediated inactivation of Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2013;10(2):134–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Tsugita A, Okada Y, Uehara K. Photosensitized inactivation of ribonucleic acids in the presence of riboflavin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965;103(2):360–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Goodrich RP, Edrich RA, Li J, Seghatchian J. The Mirasol PRT system for pathogen reduction of platelets and plasma: an overview of current status and future trends. Transfus Apher Sci. 2006;35(1):5–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Kumar V, Lockerbie O, Keil SD, Ruane PH, Platz MS, Martin CB, et al. Riboflavin and UV-light based pathogen reduction: extent and consequence of DNA damage at the molecular level. Photochem Photobiol. 2004;80:15–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Reber F, Seiler T. Keratocyte cytotoxicity of riboflavin/UVA-treatment in vitro. Eye (Lond). 2004;18(7):718–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Famose F. Evaluation of accelerated collagen cross-linking for the treatment of melting keratitis in ten cats. Vet Ophthalmol. 2015;18(2):95–104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Famose F. Evaluation of accelerated collagen cross-linking for the treatment of melting keratitis in eight dogs. Vet Ophthalmol. 2014;17(5):358–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Tabibian et al. 2016

Advertisement