Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical outcome from different doses and influence of PDT treatment

From: Central serous chorioretinopathy: updates in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapeutic strategies

References

Study design

Participants

Dosage

(Full dose or half, 1/3 dose)

Duration

(Months, M)

Results

Chan et al. (2003) [108]

Prospective study

6 eyes with persistent or cCSCR

Full-dose PDT

12.7

Succeeding to stop fluorescein leakage without recurrence of CSCR

Chan et al. (2008) [106]

Prospective study

48 eyes with cCSCR

Half-dose PDT

12

Resolution of SRF and improvement of BCVA

Chan et al. (2008) [102]

Prospective study, RCT

63 eyes with aCSCR

Half-dose PDT vs. placebo

12

Absence of exudative macular detachment and improvement of VA

Zhao et al. (2009) [113]

Prospective study

15 eyes with aCSCR

70%, 60%, 50%, 40%, 30%, 20%, and 10% of full dose PDT

12

One-third-dose is safe and effective in the treatment of aCSCR

Bae et al. (2011) [117]

Prospective, a single pilot study

16 eyes with cCSCR

Low-fluence PDT vs. intravitreal injections of ranibizumab

3

Ranibizumab injections was not promising compared with low-fluence PDT in terms of anatomic outcomes

Uetani et al. (2012) [105]

Prospective study

16 eyes with cCSCR

Half-dose PDT vs. one-third-dose PDT

3

Half-dose PDT is more effective in resolution of SRF

Kim et al. (2014) [111]

Retrospective study

21 eyes with aCSCR

Half-dose PDT vs. observation

12

Rapid resolution of SRF in aCSCR by half-dose PDT

Kim et al. (2015) [118]

Retrospective study

57 eyes with cCSCR

Half-dose PDT vs. half-fluence PDT

24–62

CRT changes reflect PDT efficacy and predict long-term recurrence and early treatment outcomes

Fujita et al. (2015) [107]

Retrospective study

204 eyes with cCSCR

Half-dose PDT

12

Effective in treating SRD and BCVA improved significantly

Cheng CK et al. (2017) [110]

Prospective study, RCT

40 eyes with cCSCR

Half-dose PDT vs. half-fluence PDT

6

Both half-dose and half-fluence PDT were similarly effective in improving VA and SRF for cCSCR

van Dijk et al. (2018) [116]

RCT

179 patients with cCSCR

Half-dose PDT vs. high-density subthreshold micropulse laser (HSML)

8

Half-dose PDT is superior to HSML for treating cCSCR

Hua et al. (2018) [[112]

Retrospective study

68 eyes with cCSCR

One-third dose PDT

6

Improvement of BCVA, reduces choroidal vasodilatation and leakage, accelerates absorption of SRF, and prompt recovery of photoreceptors

van Rijssen et al. (2021) [115]

Retrospective study

34 eyes with cCSCR

Half-dose PDT

12

SRF and BCVA were improved

Pichai et al. (2021) [[114]

Retrospective study

46 eyes with recurrent or cCSCR

Half-dose PDT vs. one-third-dose PDT

12

One-third-dose PDT was effective in improving BCVA and CRT but had higher recurrence rate of SRF

  1. aCSCR = acute chronic central serous chorioretinopathy; cCSCR = chronic central serous chorioretinopathy; BCVA = best corrected visual acuity; CRT = central retinal thickness; PDT = photodynamic therapy; RCT = randomized controlled trial; SRD = subretinal detachment; SRF = subretinal fluid; VA = visual acuity