Skip to main content

Table 3 A summary of the comparative studies between different centration methods

From: Centration axis in refractive surgery

Study

Laser platform

Sub-group

n

Condition

Follow up

Pre-op MRSE (D)

Post-op MRSE (D)

Res. Ref. (D)

BCVA

Saf index

Eff index

Corneal light reflex

Okamoto et al. [ 38 ]

NIDEK CXIII

CSCLR

268

Myo

1 M

−4.88 ± 1.55

0.17 ± 0.39

 

-

1.18

1.047

LOS

288

Myo

1 M

−5.05 ± 1.63

0.19 ± 0.48

 

-

1.138

0.997

Wu et al. [ 39 ]

AOV

CLR

60

-

-

-

-

90% within ±0.5 (Astig)

No significant difference (p > 0.05)

-

-

PC

59

-

-

-

-

72.8% within ±0.50.5 (Astig)

-

-

Okamoto et al. [ 40 ]

Nidek

CSCLR

317

Myo

3 M

-

+0.123 ± 0.378

-

-

Significantly higher for CSCLR (P < 0.05)

LOS

269

Myo

3 M

-

+0.187 ± 0.480

-

-

Visual Axis

Kermani et al. [ 42 ]

Nidek

LOS

181

Hyp

3 M

+2.46 ± 1.32

+0.19 ± 0.57

64% within ±0.5

92% within 1 line

-

-

Visual Axis

64

Hyp

3 M

+2.57 ± 1.26

+0.29 ± 0.70

81% within ±0.5

91% within 1 line

-

-

Normal corneal vertex

Arbelaez et al. [ 4 ]

SCHWIND

CV

24

Myo Astig

6 M

-

-

-

38% improved

-

-

PC

29

Myo Astig

6 M

-

-

-

24% improved

-

-

  1. CSCLR: coaxially sighted corneal light reflex; CLR: corneal light reflex; LOS: line of sight; CV: corneal vertex; PC: pupil center; n: number of eyes; Myo: myopia; Hyp: hyperopia; Astig: astigmatism; MRSE: manifest refraction spherical equivalent; BCVA: best corrected visual acuity; Res. Ref.: residual refraction; saf Index: safety index; eff Index: efficacy index.