Skip to main content

Table 8 Comparison across surgical techniques of presbyopic correction

From: Presbyopic correction on the cornea

Presbyopic approach

n

Follow-Up

UDVA

UNVA

DCNVA

CDVA

CNVA

Refr.Outc.

Retreat.

Reversal

Monovision

514

6M-5Y

20/20

J1

---

---

---

---

17%

5%

87% > 20/25

90% > J2

Multifocal

234

6M-2Y

20/20

J4

J5

12% < āˆ’2lns

11% < āˆ’2lns

76% Ā± 0.5DS

21%

---

87% > 20/25

81% > J3

49% > +2lns

LBV

670

1Y

20/17

J3

---

0% < āˆ’2lns

---

88% Ā± 0.5DS

19%

---

99% > 20/25

91% > J3

86% Ā± 0.5DC

Supracor

169

6M

20/23

J2-J3

---

9% < āˆ’2lns

0% < āˆ’2lns

54% Ā± 0.5DS

13%

---

58% > 20/25

90% > J3

46% Ā± 0.5DC

Intracor

189

6M-18M

20/24

J3

J2

9% < āˆ’2lns

11% < āˆ’2lns

---

---

---

77% > 20/25

66% > J2

KAMRA

166

6M-4Y

20/17

J3

---

5% < āˆ’2lns

5% < āˆ’2lns

---

1%

6%

93% > 20/25

73% > J2

PresbyMAX

892

6M-1Y

20/24

J1

J3

5% < āˆ’2lns

3% < āˆ’2lns

85% Ā± 0.5DS

10%

1%

77% > 20/25

90% > J2

38% > +2lns

98% Ā± 0.5DC

  1. UDVA: uncorrected distance visual acuity, UNVA: uncorrected near visual acuity, n: number of patients in the study, DCNVA: distance-corrected near visual acuity, CDVA: corrected distance visual acuity, CNVA: corrected near visual acuity, Refr. Outc.: refractive outcome, Retreat.: retreatment rate, M: months, Y: year(s), J: Jaeger scale for near vision, lns: Snellen lines, DS: dioptre sphere, DC: dioptre cylinder.