From: Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation after laser in situ keratomileusis
Author | Year | Type | Previous surgery | Period (months) | Eyes | Age (years) | MSE (D) | UDVA | CDVA | Within ± 0.5 D | Within ± 1.0 D | Complications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Srinivasan et al. [24] | 2008 | V3 (non-hole) | RK | 3 to 7 | 4 | 33 to 45 | + 5.31 + 3.25 to + 9.0 | 20/24 20/30 to 20/20 | 20/24 20/30 to 20/20 | 100% | 100% | None |
Kamiya et al. [25] | 2008 | V4 (non-hole) | RK | 12 | 1 | 49 | + 4.75 | 0.8 decimal | 1.2 decimal | 100% | 100% | None |
Kamiya et al. [26] | 2010 | V4 (non-hole) with LRIs | LASIK | 10 | 1 | 48 | + 1.75 | 1.0 decimal | 1.2 decimal | 100% | 100% | None |
Chen et al. [27] | 2016 | V4 (non-hole) | RK, PRK, LASIK, TOGCA, LASEK | 39.05 ± 19.22 | 19 | 37.54 ± 7.59 | − 7.45 ± 3.02 | 0.64 ± 0.24 decimal | 0.79 ± 0.24 decimal | 52.63% | 73.68% | 1 eye cataract RD |
Alfonso et al. [28] | 2018 | V3 to V5 (non-hole and hole) after IOL implantation | LASIK, PRK | 19.02 ± 22.98 | 12 | 59.34 ± 11.44 | − 1.23 ± 2.18 sphere − 1.02 ± 1.37 cylinder | 0.68 ± 0.23 decimal | 0.78 ± 0.14 decimal | 91.7% | 91.7% | None |
RK | 16.06 ± 9.53 | 8 | − 1.13 ± 2.72 sphere − 3.16 ± 1.96 cylinder | 0.73 ± 0.19 decimal | 0.78 ± 0.16 decimal | 100% | 100% | None | ||||
Moshirfar et al. [29] | 2020 | N.A (non-hole) | LASIK, PRK | 12 | 13 | 33.7 | − 12.42 ± 1.81 | 0.99 ± 0.42 efficacy index | 1.15 ± 0.38 safety index | 7 eyes (100%) | 7 eyes (100%) | None |
Current | V4c, V5 (hole) | LASIK | 6 | 31 | 41.4 ± 7.1 | − 1.87 ± 0.91 | − 0.14 ± 0.11 logMAR | − 0.22 ± 0.09 logMAR | 81% | 100% | None |