Skip to main content

Table 4 Postoperative values of wavefront aberrations of the analysed intervention groups at two pupil sizes obtained at 3 months

From: Retinal image quality with multifocal, EDoF, and accommodative intraocular lenses as studied by pyramidal aberrometry

Variable

Group A

P-value

x ± s

Group B

P-value

x ± s

Group C*

P-value

x ± s

Group D*

P-value

x ± s

Group E

P-value

x ± s

Group F

P-value

x ± s

Group G

P-value

x ± s

Group H

P-value

x ± s

Group I

P-value

x ± s

P-value (groups)†

Total RMS (µm)

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 3 mm

0.43 ± 0.19

0.44 ± 0.19

0.49 ± 0.18

0.46 ± 0.15

0.49 ± 0.16

0.33 ± 0.11

0.53 ± 0.17

0.28 ± 0.10

0.60 ± 0.28

 < 0.001

 4 mm

0.66 ± 0.17

0.70 ± 0.31

0.83 ± 0.21

0.83 ± 0.28

1.00 ± 0.24

0.59 ± 0.25

0.78 ± 0.22

0.42 ± 0.17

1.10 ± 0.51

 < 0.001

LOA RMS (µm)

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 3 mm

0.39 ± 0.20

0.34 ± 0.20

0.38 ± 0.16

0.39 ± 0.16

0.42 ± 0.17

0.30 ± 0.12

0.47 ± 0.16

0.23 ± 0.11

0.56 ± 0.27

 < 0.001

 4 mm

0.62 ± 0.20

0.59 ± 0.26

0.64 ± 0.25

0.71 ± 0.32

0.90 ± 0.28

0.55 ± 0.25

0.64 ± 0.21

0.33 ± 0.19

1.05 ± 0.52

 < 0.001

HOA RMS (µm)

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 3 mm

0.16 ± 0.05

0.23 ± 0.10

0.30 ± 0.13

0.21 ± 0.07

0.22 ± 0.09

0.12 ± 0.05

0.25 ± 0.08

0.15 ± 0.04

0.18 ± 0.06

 < 0.001

 4 mm

0.26 ± 0.08

0.38 ± 0.18

0.50 ± 0.12

0.40 ± 0.13

0.40 ± 0.14

0.20 ± 0.09

0.44 ± 0.13

0.23 ± 0.05

0.33 ± 0.14

 < 0.001

PSF Strehl ratio

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 3 mm

0.25 ± 0.08

0.22 ± 0.09

0.23 ± 0.07

0.23 ± 0.07

0.20 ± 0.07

0.26 ± 0.07

0.22 ± 0.07

0.29 ± 0.07

0.17 ± 0.08

 < 0.001

 4 mm

0.18 ± 0.05

0.16 ± 0.05

0.16 ± 0.05

0.15 ± 0.04

0.12 ± 0.04

0.18 ± 0.05

0.15 ± 0.04

0.21 ± 0.05

0.12 ± 0.05

 < 0.001

PSFw2 Strehl ratio

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

0.015

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 3 mm

0.41 ± 0.11

0.28 ± 0.07

0.27 ± 0.08

0.35 ± 0.10

0.32 ± 0.11

0.52 ± 0.14

0.27 ± 0.07

0.40 ± 0.07

0.36 ± 0.11

 < 0.001

 4 mm

0.28 ± 0.07

0.21 ± 0.06

0.18 ± 0.06

0.21 ± 0.06

0.23 ± 0.16

0.31 ± 0.10

0.17 ± 0.04

0.26 ± 0.04

0.21 ± 0.06

 < 0.001

  1. HOA high-order aberration; LOA low-order aberration; PSF point spread function; PSFw2 point spread function without second-order aberrations; RMS root mean square; x ± s mean ± standard deviation
  2. Group A: AcrySof SA60AT; Group B: SIFI Miniwell; Group C: LENTIS Mplus LS-313 MF30; Group D: LENTIS Mplus LS-313 MF15; Group E: AkkoLens Lumina; Group F: AT LISA Tri 839MP; Group G: Precizon Presbyopic; Group H: AcrySof IQ PanOptix; Group I: Tecnis Eyhanc
  3. * There was one patient whose left eye was included in Group C and the right eye in Group D; † The first P-value is for the difference between 3 and 4 mm in the selected outcome among the groups, and the other due P-values are only referring to selected outcome at 3 or 4 mm, respectively
Back to article page

Eye and Vision

ISSN: 2326-0254