Skip to main content

Table. 2 Studies reporting higher-order aberrations (microns) using Hartmann-Shack or ray-tracing devices at different pupil diameters

From: In vivo optical quality of posterior-chamber phakic implantable collamer lenses with a central port

Authors HOAs(4.0-mm) HOAs(5.0-mm) HOAs(6.0-mm) HOAs(a-mm) Device
Shimizu et al. [8] 0.12 ± NR 0.38 ± NR KR-9000 (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan)
Hosny and Shalaby [9] 0.31 ViSX Wavescan (Johnson & Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, USA)
Huseynova et al. [11] 0.29 ± NR 0.44 ± NR KR-1 W (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan)
Tian et al. [12] 0.81 iTrace (Tracey Technologies,Houston, USA)
Park et al. [13] 0.13 ± 0.05 KR-1 W (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan)
Liu et al. [15] 0.11 ± 0.03 0.39 ± 0.10 ViSX Wavescan (Johnson & Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, USA)
Qin et al. [16] 0.47 ± 0.00 iTrace (Tracey Technologies,Houston, USA)
Wan et al. [17]b 0.38 ± 0.140.42 ± 0.180.36 ± 0.160.32 ± 0.08 WASCA (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany)
Wei et al. [19] 0.26 ± 0.07 WASCA (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany)
Wei et al. [20]c 0.27 ± 0.080.27 ± 0.12 WASCA (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany)
Aruma et al. [24] 0.38 ± 0.18 WASCA (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany)
  1. HOA higher-order aberrations; NR not reported;
  2. a: pupil diameter not indicated; b: data of 4 subgroups with SE ≤ 6.0 D, SE from −6.13 to −9.0 D, SE from − 9.13 to −12.0 D and SE from − 12.13 to 18.0 D (from top to bottom); c: data of 2 subgroups of non-toric (top) and toric lenses (bottom)