Skip to main content

Table. 2 Studies reporting higher-order aberrations (microns) using Hartmann-Shack or ray-tracing devices at different pupil diameters

From: In vivo optical quality of posterior-chamber phakic implantable collamer lenses with a central port

Authors

HOAs(4.0-mm)

HOAs(5.0-mm)

HOAs(6.0-mm)

HOAs(a-mm)

Device

Shimizu et al. [8]

0.12 ± NR

0.38 ± NR

KR-9000 (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan)

Hosny and Shalaby [9]

0.31

ViSX Wavescan (Johnson & Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, USA)

Huseynova et al. [11]

0.29 ± NR

0.44 ± NR

KR-1 W (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan)

Tian et al. [12]

0.81

iTrace (Tracey Technologies,Houston, USA)

Park et al. [13]

0.13 ± 0.05

KR-1 W (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan)

Liu et al. [15]

0.11 ± 0.03

0.39 ± 0.10

ViSX Wavescan (Johnson & Johnson Vision, Jacksonville, USA)

Qin et al. [16]

0.47 ± 0.00

iTrace (Tracey Technologies,Houston, USA)

Wan et al. [17]b

0.38 ± 0.140.42 ± 0.180.36 ± 0.160.32 ± 0.08

WASCA (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany)

Wei et al. [19]

0.26 ± 0.07

WASCA (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany)

Wei et al. [20]c

0.27 ± 0.080.27 ± 0.12

WASCA (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany)

Aruma et al. [24]

0.38 ± 0.18

WASCA (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany)

  1. HOA higher-order aberrations; NR not reported;
  2. a: pupil diameter not indicated; b: data of 4 subgroups with SE ≤ 6.0 D, SE from −6.13 to −9.0 D, SE from − 9.13 to −12.0 D and SE from − 12.13 to 18.0 D (from top to bottom); c: data of 2 subgroups of non-toric (top) and toric lenses (bottom)