From: Corneal compensation of presbyopia: PresbyLASIK: an updated review
Author | Procedure | Follow up | No. of patients | Median Age (years) | UNVA | UDVA | Safety | Spectacle independence / Satisfaction | Retreatments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pinelli et al. [21] | PML | 6 months | 22 hyperopes | 56 | 0.84 ± 0.14 | 1.06 ± 0.13 | 4.5% lost 1 line of BSCVA | 82% were very satisfied | 12% improvement of distance vision |
Gordon et al. [22] | PML | 3 months | 102 hyperopes and myopes | >40 | 44%→ J1, 60% →J2 | 81%→ 20/20 | No visual loss | NA | 10% higher than standard LASIK treatment (typically ~2%) |
Epstein et al. [23] | Peripheral presbyLASIK in the non-dominant eye, monofocal LASIK in the dominant eye | 1 year | 103 hyperopes and myopes | 53.3 | 71.4% hyperopes and 65.3% myopes had 20/20 at 40 cm | 67.9% hyperopes →20/20. 70.7% myopes →20/20 | 14.3% hyperopes lost 1 line of distance BSCVA | 91.3% had spectacle independence. 89% hyperopes, 92% myopes | 26.6% of myopes. 28.6% of hyperopes. |
Danasory et al. [24] | Peripheral presbyLASIK | 1 year | 34 Hyperopes and 39 myopes | 49 ± 5.6 | 56% hyperopes and 44% of myopes had 20/20 or better | 60% of the hyperopes →J2 84% of the myopes→J2 | 2% of each group lost 2 lines of BSCVA | 58.9% of the hyperopes and 55.5% of the myopes were not using spectacles for reading the newspaper. | 18.75% of the hyperopes and 28% of the myopes were retreated |