From: Corneal compensation of presbyopia: PresbyLASIK: an updated review
Author | Procedure | Follow up | No. of patients | Mean Age (years) | UNVA | UDVA | Safety | Spectacle independence / Satisfaction | Retreatments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alió et al. [8] | Central PresbyLASIK | 6 months | 25 hyperopes | 58 | 72% → >20/40 | 64% → 20/20 | 28% lost 2 lines of BSCVA | 72% spectacle independence for all distances | 12% standard LASIK for distance |
Jackson et al. [10] | Central PresbyLASIK | 12 months | 25 hyperopes | 55.1 ± 4.6 | 100% → J3 | 100% → 20/25 | 10% lost >2 lines of CDVA. 8.3% lost > 2 lines of CNVA, at 6 months. | 80% did not use spectacles to write checks or for computer work. 40% could read without spectacles. | NA |
Ryan et al. [12] | Supracor | 6 months | 23 hyperopes | 57 | 91% → N8 or better | 91% → 0.2 logMAR | 6% lost 2 or more lines of CDVA | 93% fully independent | 22% retreatment to enhance UDVA |
Saib et al. [14] | Supracor and micro-monovision | 12 months | 24 hyperopes | 54.3 ± 4 | 84.21% → J1 94.73% → J2 or better | 100% → 20/25 | 9.4% lost 1 line of CDVA 4.05% lost 2 or 3 lines of CDVA. | 83.3% fully independent | 6.75% |
Uthoff et al. [18] | PresbyMAX | 6 months | 30 patients 10 myopic 10 emmetropic 10 hyperopic | 54 | 0.3 logRAD or better 90% emmetropic 80% myopic and hyperopic | 0.1logMAR → 100% hyperopic 80% emmetropic 70% myopic | 10% lost 2 lines 40% lost 1 line of the hyperopic and emmetropic group. 10% myopes lost 3 lines, 10% lost 2 lines and 10% lost 1 line of BCDVA. | NA | None |
Luger et al. [19] | PresbyMAX | 1 year | 31 patients myopic and hyperopic with or without astigmatism | 53 ± 4 | 84% → 0.1 logRAD or better | 70% → 0.1 logMAR or better | 3% lost 2 lines of CDVA, 8% lost 2 lines of CNVA | NA | NA |
Luger et al. [16] | PresbyMAX and micro-monovision | 1 year | 32 patients myopic and hyperopic | 51 ± 3 | 90% → J2 | 93% → 20/20 | 7% lost 2 lines of CDVA | Improvement from little (preoperative) to high (postoperative) satisfaction | 19%, to improve distance or near VA |
Baudu et al. [17] | PresbyMAX | 6 months | 350 patients, myopes and hyperopes | 53 ± 6 | 91% → 0.1 logRAD or better | 76% → 0.1 logMAR or better | Myopes had a global loss averaged -0.8 ± 0.5 lines and ranged from -2 to 0 lines, hyperopes had a global loss averaged -0.9 ± 0.5 lines and ranged from -3 to 0 lines. | NA | NA |
Chan et al. [20] | PresbyMAX in the non-dominant eye, monofocal LASIK in the dominant eye | 1 year | 36 hyperopes | 53.1 ± 4 | 77% → J2 or better | 87% → 20/25 or better | No patient had a loss of 2 Snellen lines of binocular CDVA. | 94.4% of patients were satisfied with their outcomes | 14% to improve near vision |