Skip to main content

Table 3 Differences in corneal elevation between the experimental and numerical data as obtained from uniform-stiffness and non-uniform-stiffness simulations

From: In vivo study of corneal responses to increased intraocular pressure loading

Participant

Simulations based on uniform stiffness distribution

Simulations based on non-uniform stiffness distribution

(μm)

(μm)

1

11.1 ± 7.4 (0.1–20.9, 13.0 %)

0.5 ± 0.4 (0.0–1.4, 0.5 %)

2

10.2 ± 7.0 (0.2–20.7, 11.0 %)

3.4 ± 3.3 (0.1–8.7, 3.6 %)

3

6.3 ± 4.7 (0.5–12.7, 8.1 %)

1.4 ± 1.0 (0.2–2.8, 1.8 %)

4

2.4 ± 2.2 (0.1–6.3, 4.2 %)

0.8 ± 0.5 (0.0–1.4, 1.4 %)

5

9.8 ± 6.4 (0.2–17.6, 12.2 %)

1.5 ± 1.5 (0.1–4.6, 1.8 %)

6

6.0 ± 4.6 (0.1–12.4, 9.0 %)

0.3 ± 0.4 (0.0–1.5, 0.5 %)

7

6.9 ± 4.5 (0.1–12.3, 13.6 %)

0.8 ± 0.7 (0.1–2.3, 1.6 %)

  1. Results include the average, standard deviation and range in microns, and the average as a percentage of the maximum experimental corneal elevation for each eye