Open Access

Genetics in Keratoconus: where are we?

Eye and Vision20163:16

DOI: 10.1186/s40662-016-0047-5

Received: 17 February 2016

Accepted: 3 June 2016

Published: 27 June 2016

Abstract

Keratoconus (KC) is a non-inflammatory thinning and protrusion of the cornea in which the cornea assumes a conical shape. Complex etiology of this condition at present remains an enigma. Although environmental factors have been involved in KC pathogenesis, strong underlining genetic susceptibility has been proven. The lack of consistent findings among early genetic studies suggested a heterogeneity and complex nature of the genetic contribution to the development of KC. Recently, genome-wide linkage studies (GWLS) and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were undertaken. Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genomic screens are also currently being carried out. Application of these recently developed comprehensive genetic tools led to a much greater success and increased reproducibility of genetic findings in KC. Involvement of the LOX gene identified through GWLS has been confirmed in multiple cohorts of KC patients around the world. KC susceptibility region located at the 2q21.3 chromosomal region near the RAB3GAP1 gene identified through GWAS was independently replicated. Rare variants in the ZNF469 gene (mutated in corneal dystrophy Brittle Cornea Syndrome) and in the TGFBI gene (mutated in multiple corneal epithelial–stromal TGFBI dystrophies) have been repeatedly identified in familial and sporadic KC patients of different ethnicities. Additional comprehensive strategies using quantitative endophenotypes have been successfully employed to bring further understanding to the genetics of KC. Additional genetic determinants including the COL5A1 gene have been identified in the GWAS of KC-related trait central corneal thickness. These recent discoveries confirmed the importance of the endophenotype approach for studying complex genetic diseases such as KC and showed that different connective tissue disorders may have the same genetic determinants.

Keywords

Keratoconus Genetics Complex disease Genetic variation Linkage Genetic association Sequencing Corneal dystrophy Genotyping

Background

Keratoconus (KC) is a complex corneal condition characterized by progressive corneal thinning and steepening resulting in moderate to marked visual impairment [1]. The disease is relatively common; it affects approximately 300,000 people in the U.S. [2, 3] and is one of the three top indications for corneal transplantation in the U.S. and worldwide [4].

KC most commonly affects children. It is often detected at puberty and is progressive until the third to fourth decade of life, when it usually arrests [1]. As the cornea thins and steepens, it assumes a conical shape, causing increasingly myopic and astigmatic vision. The decrease in visual acuity can first be addressed with glasses, then later with rigid gas permeable contact lenses. If the disease continues to progress, the contact lens wear becomes gradually more intolerable, and corneal transplantation is indicated to restore vision. These visual changes can also significantly decrease quality of life for KC patients, especially when the patient has been affected for more than a decade, and as the visual acuity of the fellow “better” eye decreases [5].

The progression of the disease is caused by a decrease in the biomechanical strength of the cornea, which is composed primarily of stacked collagen and keratocytes [6]. Current research suggests a complex etiology for the disease including a genetic predisposition [3, 7, 8]. Studies have shown that a positive family history greatly increases the odds of a patient being diagnosed with KC [912].

There is also a possible association of KC with other genetic conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [13], Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) [14], rare chromosomal abnormalities including those associated with Down syndrome [15], and diabetes mellitus (DM), for which DM patients have a lower incidence of KC [1618].

However, isolated KC with no associations is by far the most common presentation seen by a practicing clinician [1, 8]. The identification of genes responsible for this type of KC has been the main focus of many studies done by many research groups around the world. Significant progress has been made towards identifying subclinical phenotypic markers suitable for genetic studies by videokeratography and optical coherence tomography, including both anterior and posterior elevation and pachymetric data. As will be shown below, several genes have been implicated across these studies, including genes coding for various collagens and related to extracellular matrix production; still, many others seem to only be tangentially related to these processes. Genetic research into the etiology of the disease will improve the clinician’s ability to predict and ultimately prevent KC in patients.

In the main part below followed by Table 1 and Fig. 1, this paper will summarize the current status of research into the genetics of KC.
Table 1

KC genes and identified variants

Gene

Function

CHR

Variant (s)

Method (Reference)

Variant Location

Ref

LOX

Lysyl oxidase, participates in collagen cross-linking

5q23.2

rs10519694

GWLS/LD/FM

Intron

[25]

rs1800449/rs2288393

GWLS/LD/FM

Missense

[25, 29]

TG

rs41407546

S

Missense

UN

rs2956540

GWLS/LD/FM

Intron

[25, 2931]

TG

COL5A1

Collagen type V, alpha-1 chain, part of fibril-forming corneal collagen

9q34.2-q34.3

rs1536482

GWLS/FM/CCT GWAS

5′ near gene

[74, 111]

rs7044529

GWLS/FM/CCT GWAS

Intron

[74, 108, 111]

CAST

Calpain/calpastatin, proteolytic degradation

5q15

rs4434401

GWLS/FM

Intron

[37]

RAB3GAP1

Rab GTPase activating protein, regulates exocytosis

2q21.3

rs4954218

GWAS

5′ near gene

[56, 60]

HGF

Hepatocyte growth factor, involved in corneal wound healing

7q21.1

rs3735520

GWAS, TG

1 KB promoter

[29, 54]

rs1014091

GWAS, S

1 KB promoter

[54, 55]

rs17501108

S

1 KB promoter

[55]

rs2286194

S

intron

[55]

FNDC3B

Fibronectin, extracellular matrix protein

3q26.31

rs4894535

CCT GWAS

Intron

[74]

FOXO1

Transcription factor

13q14.1

rs2721051

CCT GWAS, LA CCT GWAS

3′ near gene

[74, 108]

TGFBI

Transforming growth factor beta induced

5q31.1

Multiple rare variants

S

Exon

[66, 67]

ZNF469

Transcription factor, regulates corneal collagen structure and synthesis

16q24.2

rs9938149

CCT GWAS, TG

3′ near gene

[74, 112]

Multiple rare variants

S

Exon

[6264]

DOCK9

Dedicator of cytokinesis 9, Guanine nucleotide-exchange factor

13q32.3

c.2262A > C p.Gln754His

GWLS/S

Missense

[41]

MPDZ-NF1B

Not available

9p23

rs1324183

CCT GWAS, TG

Intergenic

[30, 74, 112]

WNT10A

Member of WNT gene family of secreted signaling proteins

2q35

rs121908120

CCT GWAS

Missense

[113]

ZEB1

Zinc finger transcription factor

10p11.22

c.1920G > T; p.Gln640His

S

Missense

[84, 85]

SOD1

Superoxide dismutase 1, cytoplasmic antioxidant enzyme

21q22.11

Multiple SNVs, deletion

S

Intron

[99, 115]

IL1A

Interleukin 1alpha, cytokine

2q13

rs2071376

TG, S

Intron

[91, 119]

IL1B

Interleukin 1beta, cytokine

2q13

rs1143627

TG, S

Promoter

[119121]

rs16944

TG, S

Promoter

[119121]

COL4A3

Collagen type IV, alpha-3 chain, structural part of corneal membranes

2q36.3

Multiple SNVs

S

Missense

[123]

COL4A4

Collagen type IV, alpha-4 chain, structural part of corneal membranes

2q36.3

Multiple SNVs

S

Missense

[123, 124]

VSX1

Visual system homeobox 1, transcription factor

20p11.2

Multiple SNVs

S

Missense, silent, intronic

[133]

Table abbreviations: KC = keratoconus; CHR = chromosome; GWLS = genome-wide linkage study; GWAS = genome-wide association study; LD = linkage disequilibrium; FM = fine mapping; S = sequencing; TG = targeted genotyping; CCT = central corneal thickness; SNV = single nucleotide variant; LA = Latino; UN = unpublished data

Fig. 1

Keratoconus genes and their involvement in other ocular diseases

Review

Genes identified through genome-wide linkage studies (GWLS)

GWLS denotes genotyping families affected by a certain disease using a collection of genetic markers across the genome, and examining how those genetic markers segregate with the disease across multiple families. GWLS, also called linkage studies, were applied successfully to identify genetic variants that contribute to rare disorders like familial breast cancer [19], Huntington disease [20], cystic fibrosis [21], and others (for a comprehensive review see [22]). For decades, these studies were generally conducted using 300–400 microsatellite markers spaced at 10–20 centimorgans (cM) apart. These multiallelic markers were robust and highly informative; however, their genotyping was a time-consuming process. Shortly after single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were discovered to be abundant polymorphic markers uniformly distributed throughout the human genome [23], dense SNP arrays quickly became the genotyping platform of choice due to the highly unparalleled interrogation and accurate scoring. Testing of genotyping data also evolved from being based on model-based (recessive, dominant, etc.) to robust non-parametric alternatives [24].

LOX

One of the most significant recent developments in the field of KC genetics is the identification of polymorphisms in the LOX (collagen crosslinking enzyme lysyl oxidase) gene that is potentially responsible for a linkage signal at the 5q32-q33 chromosomal region identified by a two-stage GWLS using hundreds of polymorphic microsatellite markers (state-of-the-art-technology available at the time) and the nonparametric method of analysis [25]. After looking at biological functions of hundreds of known or predicted genes in five linkage regions, LOX was found to be the most promising candidate among plausible KC candidate genes [26]. LOX initiates the cross-linking of collagens and elastin by catalyzing oxidative deamination of the epsilon-amino group in certain lysine and hydroxylysine residues [27]. LOX defects can potentially lead to the reduction of cross-linking of collagen fibers of the corneal stroma thus leading to biomechanical weakening of the cornea. Despite the fact that an early study in a group of Italian patients failed to identify LOX mutations [28], further extensive genotyping in multiple samples of independently collected KC patients around the world confirmed the effect of SNP rs2956540 in LOX in Czech KC cases of European descent [29], Chinese cases [30], Iranian cases [31], and in a recent meta-analysis of published studies [32]. LOX involvement is also supported by functional data that showed its attenuation in corneal epithelium of KC patients at levels corresponding to disease severity [33] and revealed changes in LOX distribution and its decreased activity in KC corneas [34].

CAST

Two independent GWLS, one in a single extended KC family and another using multiple unrelated families with KC, mapped a KC locus to a genomic region located at 5q14.3-q21.1 [26, 35]. This region overlaps the CAST gene encoding calpastatin, the inhibitor of calpains (non-lysosomal intracellular proteases), which was considered a likely candidate based on the robust presence in the mammalian eye [36], which was further confirmed by in silico analysis of EST (expressed sequence tags) databases of human eye tissues [37]. This analysis showed the presence of different CAST isoforms in different parts of the eye (cornea, lens, pterygium) as well as a potential difference in their distribution in KC cornea ESTs as compared with those from normal corneal tissues [37]. In addition, higher levels of calpain small subunit-1 protein were found by protein profiling in the epithelia of KC corneas [38]. Initial linkage findings using microsatellite markers were further confirmed by genotyping of high-density SNPs in and around the CAST gene in family and case-control panels of patients with KC followed by comprehensive linkage and association analysis [37, 39]. Both studies found CAST SNPs to be significantly associated with KC.

DOCK9

One previously reported chromosomal region at 13q32 linked to KC in Ecuadorian families [40] was sequenced in 51 individuals and 105 matching controls. This mutation screen identified a possible functionally important mutation c.2262A > C (p.Gln754His, rs191047852) in the DOCK9 gene (dedicator of cytokinesis 9), which segregated with phenotype in one large Ecuadorian family [41]. This particular change was absent in other tested families and in controls, however it is present, albeit with extremely low frequency (minor allele frequency (MAF) = 0.00002; Minor Allele Count = 3) in 61,000 individuals collected around the world and sequenced by The Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC). The pathogenic nature of this change is supported by functional investigation, suggesting that it results in the aberrant splicing of the DOCK9 gene that leads to exon skipping, resulting in the introduction of a premature stop codon, disrupting the functional domains of DOCK9 protein that may alter the biological role of DOCK9 as an activator of Cdc42 (cell division cycle 42), an important regulator of corneal wound repair [42].

Other loci

Reports on familial KC have proposed both dominant and recessive modes of inheritance, while most families do not fit any typical mode of inheritance [1]. To date, the following gene loci for KC have been identified using GWLS methodology worldwide: 1p36.23-36.21, 2p24, 2q13, 3p14-q13, 5q14.3-q21.1, 5q21.2, 5q32-q33, 8q13.1-q21.11, 9q34, 13q32, 14q11.2, 14q24.3, 15q15.1, 15q22.33-24.2, 16q22.3-q23.1, and 20p13-p12.2, 20q12 [26, 35, 40, 4351]. Potential mutations in the IL1RN (interleukin 1 receptor antagonist) and SLC4A11 (solute carrier family 4, sodium borate transporter, member 11) genes have been identified in Ecuadorian family linked to the 2q13-q14.3 and 20p13-p12 regions [51].

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS)

For many years, linkage analysis or GWLS was the primary tool used for the genetic mapping of Mendelian and complex traits with familial aggregation. However, over the last ten years, GWAS have evolved into a powerful tool for investigating the genetic architecture of human genetic diseases, especially complex and common genetic traits. Analytical methods used for GWAS are based on interrogating SNPs, single base-pair changes in the DNA sequence that were found to occur with high frequency in the human genome [23]. SNPs are by far the most abundant and common form of genetic variation in the human genome. Many SNPs are present in a large proportion of human populations [52]. A SNP with allele frequency significantly altered between the case and the control group is considered to be associated with the trait. Minimizing the false positive rate is the most important consideration for GWAS. Thus, genome-wide significance threshold of a nominal p-value < 5 × 10−8 has been established [53]. Well-designed GWAS would also include a replication and analyses that include consideration of the joint as well as the individual discovery and replication datasets.

HGF

Two major GWAS were undertaken almost in parallel and identified new candidate genes for KC. The first one using pooled DNA from an Australian cohort of KC samples and two-step confirmation procedure using two independent case-control cohorts) identified promoter polymorphism SNP rs3735520 in the HGF (hepatocyte growth factor) gene [54]. Effect of HGF SNP rs3735520 was confirmed in a panel of unrelated Czech KC cases of European descent [29]. Interestingly, extensive analysis of HGF SNPs in addition to the Australian KC population identified multiple associated SNPs [55].

RAB3GAP1

The second GWAS used discovery cohort of 222 Caucasian KC patients and 3324 matched controls and two independent confirmation panels, a case-control panel of 304 cases and 518 controls and a family panel of 307 subjects (146 affected) in 70 families. A novel SNP rs4954218 in the RAB3GAP1 (RAB3 GTPase activating protein catalytic subunit) gene was identified [56]. Mutations in RAB3GAP1 gene are associated with the Warburg Micro syndrome in patients of different ethnic backgrounds [5759]. Notably, identified polymorphism SNP rs4954218 was independently replicated in an unrelated cohort of Australian Caucasian KC patients thus providing further validity to this novel locus [60].

Genes involved in KC and other corneal dystrophies

TGFBI

TGF beta-induced protein (TGFBIP) is an extracellular protein that mediates cell adhesion to collagen, laminin and fibronectin and proteoglycans, such as decorin and biglycan with expression changes triggered by the activation of the TGFB signaling pathway [61]. Transcript coding for TGFBI (previously called BIGH3) was the second most abundant transcript identified in the cDNA library constructed from KC corneas [62]. TGFBI gene mutations have been frequently identified in patients with corneal epithelial–stromal TGFBI dystrophies, a group of heterogeneous conditions that are characterized by the progressive loss of corneal transparency [63] resulting in the corneal abnormalities witnessed in transgenic mice [64, 65]. Recently, potential mutations in TGFBI was identified in Chinese [66] and in Polish KC patients [67]. The TGFBI protein has been identified in primary amyloid deposits of hereditary corneal dystrophies and in secondary corneal amyloidosis of diverse etiologies [68] as well as in corneal stromal amyloid deposits in KC patients [69]. Increased levels of TGFBI protein have been identified in corneas of patients with Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) [70, 71]. However, not all analyzed KC patients showed association with polymorphisms in the TGFBI gene [72].

ZNF469

Brittle cornea syndrome (BCS) is an autosomal recessive generalized connective tissue disorder associated with extreme corneal thinning (220–450 μm) and a high risk of corneal rupture. Homozygous mutations in the ZNF469 (zinc finger protein 469) gene coding for a transcriptional factor containing zinc finger domains were found in patients with BCS type 1 [73]. The common genetic variant rs9938149 in ZNF469 was found to confer increased KC risk [74] and influence CCT (central corneal thickness) in the general population [7476]. In addition, extensive sequencing of this gene in KC patients of different ethnicities by various research groups identified significant enrichment of a number of potentially pathogenic ZNF469 alleles [7779]. These missense variants were found in 23 % of 43 KC patients from New Zealand, one-half of which were Maori or Polynesian [78] and in 12.5 % of three European cohorts with isolated KC (two from the United Kingdom, and one from Switzerland [79]). However, in contrast to previous studies, recent sequencing analysis of ZNF469 in Polish patients with KC and high myopia and Polish individuals without ocular abnormalities found no significant enrichment of any sequence variants in ZNF469 [80]. Based on these results together with the lack of evidence for the functional impact of the variants, ZNF469 involvement remains contentious at this time.

ZEB1

Mutations in the ZEB1 (zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1) gene are repeatedly found in patients with posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy type 3 (PPCD3) [81, 82] and seem to result in variable ocular phenotypes [83]. In particular, a unique coding mutation c.1920G > T (p.Gln640His) in this gene has been first identified in a family with KC and FECD [84] and later in a patient with triple corneal dystrophy consisting of KC, epithelial basement membrane corneal dystrophy (EBMCD) and FECD [85] thus, further supporting mutational spectrum of ZEB1 with a unique genotype/phenotype correlation.

VSX1

The VSX1 (visual system homeobox 1) gene belongs to a family of homeodomain transcription factors that are thought to control cell differentiation in craniofacial and ocular development, making it a promising functional candidate gene for KC pathogenesis of various corneal dystrophies [86, 87]. Various VSX1 gene variants have been proposed to be the genetic cause of KC in several sporadic and familiar cases [87], Italian patients [88], Iranian patients [89], Korean [90], and Chinese [91] patients, as well as in cases with PPCD (reviewed in [92]). However, no evidence of association with VSX1 variants was identified in subsequent recent research studies with large patient cohorts and recently developed genotyping methods that allow for simultaneous interrogation of hundreds of thousands of independent SNPs providing information on common genomic variation [9399]. In addition, extending previously identified VSX1 variants to additional populations and samples provided evidence of their benign nature [100, 101]. Current evidence seems to largely support a limited role for VSX1 in KC pathogenesis.

Use of endophenotype CCT to identify additional genes and variants

Variation in CCT is one of the most highly heritable human traits [102, 103]. Reduced CCT is often associated with KC [104, 105]. Several recently performed GWAS identified a number of genomic loci associated with differences in CCT that revealed differences in genetic determinants of CCT between ethnic groups, and evaluated the relevance of CCT-associated loci to KC susceptibility [7476, 106108].

COL5A1

Since the corneal stroma is composed of collagen fibrils, it is not surprising that a number of genomic loci associated with CCT contain genes that code for various collagens, such as COL1A1 and COL1A2 [109], and COL8A2 [76]. The most evidence, however, points to the involvement of the COL5A1 gene coding for type V collagen subunit 1 in both CCT variation [76, 106, 108, 110] and KC [74, 111]. However, in-depth analysis of variants in KC families as well as in sporadic cases showed that while some KC patients carrying minor alleles of these variants do have thinner corneas, others do not, highlighting the complex relationship between genetic variation in COL5A1, corneal thinning and KC development [111].

FNDC3B, FOXO1, MPDZ-NF1B

CCT-associated variants rs4894535 located in the FNDC3B gene, rs2721051 near the FOXO1 gene, and rs1324183 located between the MPDZ and NF1B genes have been found to be associated with KC in large multinational cohorts of KC patients and controls [74]. SNP rs1324183 was further associated with an increased risk of KC in Chinese cases [30] and in the Australian population [112].

WNT10A

The identified CCT variants only explain about 8 % of the variability of the trait [75]. One possible component of the missing heritability is low frequency variants. The published GWAS of CCT to date focus primarily on common variants (i.e., MAF >5 %); however, when putative rare functional coding exome variants from the Illumina Human Exome array were evaluated, a novel rare WNT10A exonic variant (rs121908120), which increases the risk of KC by decreasing corneal thickness, was identified [113]. This variant is located in a gene 437 kb away from the USP37 gene, previously associated with CCT, and completely accounts for the signal previously seen at USP37. It increases the risk of KC two times. WNT10A (wingless-type MMTV integration site family member 10A) belongs to the WNT gene family. This family consists of structurally related genes encoding secreted signaling molecules that have been implicated in important developmental processes, including regulation of cell fate and patterning during corneal development [114].

Other potentially involved genes

SOD1

The SOD1 (superoxide dismutase 1) gene has been proposed and repeatedly investigated as a candidate gene for KC with published data supporting [99, 115] as well as refuting [28, 40, 89, 93, 116] its involvement. The sometimes identified increased levels of oxidative stress markers in corneas from patients with KC [117, 118] suggest that defects in the SOD1 gene, encoding a major cytoplasmic antioxidant enzyme that metabolizes superoxide radicals, might be involved in the development of this disease. However, lack of data supporting such genetic involvement suggests a possibility that said oxidative stress may be an end product of other pathologic processes caused by defects in other genes.

IL1B, IL1A

IL1B (interleukin 1 beta) promoter polymorphisms and IL1A (interleukin 1 alpha) intronic polymorphism rs2071376 have been suggested to play roles in KC susceptibility due to significant differences in allelic frequency between groups of KC patients and controls in Han Chinese [91, 119], Korean [120], and Japanese [121] populations. However, the same polymorphism showed no evidence of association in the Turkish population [122].

COL4A3, COL4A4

Genes coding for collagens COL4A3 (type IV collagen alpha3, COL4A4 (type IV collagen alpha4) have been suggested as well [123, 124]; however, additional studies in multiple populations found no association with these SNPs [91, 125] or found evidence of their extensive presence in the normal population [126].

Rare recurring mutation in miR184 (microRNA184) in families with KC and cataracts

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) bind to complementary sequences within the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of mRNAs from hundreds of target genes, leading either to mRNA degradation or suppression of translation. Germline sequence variants in mature miRNAs are extremely rare possibly due to the extreme conservation and importance of mature miRNAs as well as its tremendously small size (18–25 base pairs). A heterozygous c.57 C > T mutation in the seed region of MIR184 (miR-184) was found to be responsible for familial severe KC combined with early-onset anterior polar cataract in the Northern Irish family [127]. The same mutation was later identified in an unrelated family with the EDICT (endothelial dystrophy, iris hypoplasia, congenital cataract, and stromal thinning) syndrome [128] and most recently in a five-generation family with cataracts and varying corneal abnormalities including severe KC and non-ectatic corneal thinning from Galicia, Spain [129]. Interestingly, genetic ancestry testing of the Spanish family strongly suggested that the c.57 C > T MIR184 mutation arose independently in the Galician and Northern Irish families and thus represents the first observation of the recurrent germline mutation in the microRNA gene leading to the genetic disease described [130]. No mutation(s) within the stem loop of MIR184 in isolated KC cases was detected in two independent screens, suggesting that mutations in MIR184 are more relevant to cases of KC associated with other ocular abnormalities [131, 132].

Discussion

Major strides had been made in the understanding of KC genetics. However, more research is needed to make biological connections between already identified KC genes as well as new genes. Several KC research groups around the world are designing and performing high-throughput studies in familial and sporadic KC patients to accomplish this task. These studies will include genotyping large cohorts of well-characterized ethnically homogenous patients and large groups of ethnically matched controls using the most comprehensive genomic chips containing up to 2.5 million independent SNPs. In addition, outgoing development and dropping prices for the next-generation sequencing (NGS) based whole genome screens are becoming more of a reality. Such screens especially in families with KC and in thoroughly selected KC patients with extreme phenotypic features can identify and test rare or low frequency variants that cannot be tested with chip technology.

As KC often begins by affecting vision, and thereby quality of life at a young age, being able to diagnose and arrest the progress of the disease at an earlier stage will aid clinicians in treating KC patients. Currently, KC is diagnosed by evaluating a variety of non-genetic metrics, such as corneal topography and pachymetry. A thorough understanding of the genetic contribution to the disease progression will increase the certainty of a KC diagnosis and allow that diagnosis to be made sooner. It may also bring additional options for the treatment of this disorder. As technology progresses and genetic screening becomes simpler and more cost effective, ophthalmologists may find value in testing suspected KC patients for the genetic variations discussed in this paper. This knowledge could enable the general ophthalmologist to understand the disease etiology such that he or she can diagnose more easily and potentially screen patients’ family members, thereby proactively caring for the disease as it develops.

Conclusion

Although the genetic etiology of KC remains to be comprehensively defined, recent GWLS and GWAS have made significant progress in identifying genetic variation that is strongly correlated with the disease. SNPs associated with the following genes have been implicated: LOX, CAST, DOCK9, IL1RN, SLC4A11, HGF, RAB3GAP1, TGFBI, ZNF469, ZEB1, VSX1, COL5A1, COL4A3, COL4A4, FNDC3B, FOXO1, MPDZ-NF1B, WNT10A, SOD1, IL1B, IL1A, in addition to the microRNA MIR184. Notably, not all analyses of each of these genes completely confirm their role in KC pathogenesis. Rather, it is likely that KC can result from abnormalities in several biochemical pathways for which the interactions have not yet been outlined. Genetic analyses that document these associations will eventually elucidate this connection.

Abbreviations

CCT, central corneal thickness; cM, centimorgan; GWAS, Genome-wide association study; GWLS, Genome-wide linkage study; KC, Keratoconus; LD, Linkage disequilibrium; NGS, next-generation sequencing

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by The Eye Defects Research Foundation Inc., the Skirball Fund for Molecular Ophthalmology and National Eye Institute grant R01-09052 (Y.S.R).

Authors’ contributions

YB contributed to the design of the manuscript, performed literature searches, drafted manuscript, and contributed to its revisions. BM contributed to the drafting of the manuscript. YSR made substantial contribution to conception, design and critical revisions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Regenerative Medicine Institute and Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
(2)
Cornea Genetic Eye Institute
(3)
The Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles

References

  1. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998;42(4):297–319.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kennedy RH, Bourne WM, Dyer JA. A 48-year clinical and epidemiologic study of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101(3):267–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Nielsen K, Hjortdal J, Pihlmann M, Corydon TJ. Update on the keratoconus genetics. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(2):106–13.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Gain P, Jullienne R, He Z, Aldossary M, Acquart S, Cognasse F, et al. Global Survey of Corneal Transplantation and Eye Banking. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(2):167–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Sahebjada S, Fenwick EK, Xie J, Snibson GR, Daniell MD, Baird PN. Impact of keratoconus in the better eye and the worse eye on vision-related quality of life. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(1):412–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Davidson AE, Hayes S, Hardcastle AJ, Tuft SJ. The pathogenesis of keratoconus. Eye (Lond). 2014;28(2):189–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Wheeler J, Hauser MA, Afshari NA, Allingham RR, Liu Y. The Genetics of Keratoconus: A Review. Reprod Syst Sex Disord. 2012;(Suppl 6). pii: 001. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3686480/.
  8. Rabinowitz YS. The genetics of keratoconus. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2003;16(4):607–20, vii.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Gordon-Shaag A, Millodot M, Kaiserman I, Sela T, Barnett Itzhaki G, Zerbib Y, et al. Risk factors for keratoconus in Israel: a case–control study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015;35(6):673–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Naderan M, Shoar S, Rezagholizadeh F, Zolfaghari M, Naderan M. Characteristics and associations of keratoconus patients. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015;38(3):199–205.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Karimian F, Aramesh S, Rabei HM, Javadi MA, Rafati N. Topographic evaluation of relatives of patients with keratoconus. Cornea. 2008;27(8):874–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Li X, Yang H, Rabinowitz YS. Longitudinal study of keratoconus progression. Exp Eye Res. 2007;85(4):502–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Tréchot F, Angioi K, Latarche C, Conroy G, Beaujeux P, Andrianjafy C, et al. Keratoconus in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a cross-sectional study. J Crohns Colitis. 2015;9(12):1108–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kosker M, Arslan N, Alp MY, Ozisler C, Acar M, Dogan AS, et al. Association between Keratoconus and familial Mediterranean fever in Turkey. Cornea. 2016;35(1):77–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Papoulidis I, Papageorgiou E, Siomou E, Oikonomidou E, Thomaidis L, Vetro A, et al. A patient with partial trisomy 21 and 7q deletion expresses mild Down syndrome phenotype. Gene. 2014;536(2):441–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Naderan M, Naderan M, Rezagholizadeh F, Zolfaghari M, Pahlevani R, Rajabi MT. Association between diabetes and keratoconus: a case–control study. Cornea. 2014;33(12):1271–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuo IC, Broman A, Pirouzmanesh A, Melia M. Is there an association between diabetes and keratoconus? Ophthalmology. 2006;113(2):184–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Woodward MA, Blachley TS, Stein JD. The association between sociodemographic factors, common systemic diseases, and Keratoconus: an analysis of a nationwide heath care claims database. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(3):457–65. e2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall JM, Lee MK, Newman B, Morrow JE, Anderson LA, Huey B, et al. Linkage of early-onset familial breast cancer to chromosome 17q21. Science. 1990;250(4988):1684–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Gusella JF, Wexler NS, Conneally PM, Naylor SL, Anderson MA, Tanzi RE, et al. A polymorphic DNA marker genetically linked to Huntington’s disease. Nature. 1983;306(5940):234–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kerem B, Rommens JM, Buchanan JA, Markiewicz D, Cox TK, Chakravarti A, et al. Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: genetic analysis. Science. 1989;245(4922):1073–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Altshuler D, Daly MJ, Lander ES. Genetic mapping in human disease. Science. 2008;322(5903):881–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Genomes Project C, Abecasis GR, Altshuler D, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Gibbs RA, et al. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature. 2010;467(7319):1061–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kruglyak L, Daly MJ, Reeve-Daly MP, Lander ES. Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. Am J Hum Genet. 1996;58(6):1347–63.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Bykhovskaya Y, Li X, Epifantseva I, Haritunians T, Siscovick D, Aldave A, et al. Variation in the lysyl oxidase (LOX) gene is associated with keratoconus in family-based and case–control studies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(7):4152–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Li X, Rabinowitz YS, Tang YG, Picornell Y, Taylor KD, Hu M, et al. Two-stage genome-wide linkage scan in keratoconus sib pair families. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(9):3791–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hämäläinen ER, Jones TA, Sheer D, Taskinen K, Pihlajaniemi T, Kivirikko KI. Molecular cloning of human lysyl oxidase and assignment of the gene to chromosome 5q23.3-31.2. Genomics. 1991;11(3):508–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. De Bonis P, Laborante A, Pizzicoli C, Stallone R, Barbano R, Longo C, et al. Mutational screening of VSX1, SPARC, SOD1, LOX, and TIMP3 in keratoconus. Mol Vis. 2011;17:2482–94.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Dudakova L, Palos M, Jirsova K, Stranecky V, Krepelova A, Hysi PG, et al. Validation of rs2956540:G > C and rs3735520:G > A association with keratoconus in a population of European descent. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23(11):1581–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Hao XD, Chen P, Chen ZL, Li SX, Wang Y. Evaluating the association between Keratoconus and reported genetic loci in a Han Chinese population. Ophthalmic Genet. 2015;36(2):132–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Hasanian-Langroudi F, Saravani R, Validad MH, Bahari G, Yari D. Association of Lysyl oxidase (LOX) polymorphisms with the risk of Keratoconus in an Iranian population. Ophthalmic Genet. 2015;36(4):309–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang J, Zhang L, Hong J, Wu D, Xu J. Association of common variants in LOX with Keratoconus: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0145815.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Shetty R, Sathyanarayanamoorthy A, Ramachandra RA, Arora V, Ghosh A, Srivatsa PR, et al. Attenuation of lysyl oxidase and collagen gene expression in keratoconus patient corneal epithelium corresponds to disease severity. Mol Vis. 2015;21:12–25.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Dudakova L, Liskova P, Trojek T, Palos M, Kalasova S, Jirsova K. Changes in lysyl oxidase (LOX) distribution and its decreased activity in keratoconus corneas. Exp Eye Res. 2012;104:74–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Tang YG, Rabinowitz YS, Taylor KD, Li X, Hu M, Picornell Y, et al. Genomewide linkage scan in a multigeneration Caucasian pedigree identifies a novel locus for keratoconus on chromosome 5q14.3-q21.1. Genet Med. 2005;7(6):397–405.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Persson H, Kawashima S, Karlsson JO. Immunohistochemical localization of calpains and calpastatin in the rabbit eye. Brain Res. 1993;611(2):272–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Li X, Bykhovskaya Y, Tang YG, Picornell Y, Haritunians T, Aldave AJ, et al. An association between the calpastatin (CAST) gene and keratoconus. Cornea. 2013;32(5):696–701.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Joseph R, Srivastava OP, Pfister RR. Differential epithelial and stromal protein profiles in keratoconus and normal human corneas. Exp Eye Res. 2011;92(4):282–98.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Bykhovskaya Y, Li X, Taylor KD, Haritunians T, Rotter JI, Rabinowitz YS. Linkage analysis of high-density SNPs confirms Keratoconus locus at 5q chromosomal region. Ophthalmic Genet. 2016;37(1):109–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Gajecka M, Radhakrishna U, Winters D, Nath SK, Rydzanicz M, Ratnamala U, et al. Localization of a gene for keratoconus to a 5.6-Mb interval on 13q32. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(4):1531–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Czugala M, Karolak JA, Nowak DM, Polakowski P, Pitarque J, Molinari A, et al. Novel mutation and three other sequence variants segregating with phenotype at keratoconus 13q32 susceptibility locus. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20(4):389–97.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Karolak JA, Rydzanicz M, Ginter-Matuszewska B, Pitarque JA, Molinari A, Bejjani BA, et al. Variant c.2262A > C in DOCK9 Leads to Exon Skipping in Keratoconus Family. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(13):7687–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Burdon KP, Coster DJ, Charlesworth JC, Mills RA, Laurie KJ, Giunta C, et al. Apparent autosomal dominant keratoconus in a large Australian pedigree accounted for by digenic inheritance of two novel loci. Hum Genet. 2008;124(4):379–86.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Hutchings H, Ginisty H, Le Gallo M, Levy D, Stoesser F, Rouland JF, et al. Identification of a new locus for isolated familial keratoconus at 2p24. J Med Genet. 2005;42(1):88–94.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Brancati F, Valente EM, Sarkozy A, Fehèr J, Castori M, Del Duca P, et al. A locus for autosomal dominant keratoconus maps to human chromosome 3p14-q13. J Med Genet. 2004;41(3):188–92.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Bisceglia L, De Bonis P, Pizzicoli C, Fischetti L, Laborante A, Di Perna M, et al. Linkage analysis in keratoconus: replication of locus 5q21.2 and identification of other suggestive Loci. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(3):1081–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Liskova P, Hysi PG, Waseem N, Ebenezer ND, Bhattacharya SS, Tuft SJ. Evidence for keratoconus susceptibility locus on chromosome 14: a genome-wide linkage screen using single-nucleotide polymorphism markers. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(9):1191–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Hughes AE, Dash DP, Jackson AJ, Frazer DG, Silvestri G. Familial keratoconus with cataract: linkage to the long arm of chromosome 15 and exclusion of candidate genes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(12):5063–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Tyynismaa H, Sistonen P, Tuupanen S, Tervo T, Dammert A, Latvala T, et al. A locus for autosomal dominant keratoconus: linkage to 16q22.3-q23.1 in Finnish families. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(10):3160–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Fullerton J, Paprocki P, Foote S, Mackey DA, Williamson R, Forrest S. Identity-by-descent approach to gene localisation in eight individuals affected by keratoconus from north-west Tasmania. Australia Hum Genet. 2002;110(5):462–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Nowak DM, Karolak JA, Kubiak J, Gut M, Pitarque JA, Molinari A, et al. Substitution at IL1RN and deletion at SLC4A11 segregating with phenotype in familial keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(3):2207–15.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. International HapMap C, Altshuler DM, Gibbs RA, Peltonen L, Altshuler DM, Gibbs RA, et al. Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations. Nature. 2010;467(7311):52–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Pe’er I, Yelensky R, Altshuler D, Daly MJ. Estimation of the multiple testing burden for genomewide association studies of nearly all common variants. Genet Epidemiol. 2008;32(4):381–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Burdon KP, Macgregor S, Bykhovskaya Y, Javadiyan S, Li X, Laurie KJ, et al. Association of polymorphisms in the hepatocyte growth factor gene promoter with keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(11):8514–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Sahebjada S, Schache M, Richardson AJ, Snibson G, Daniell M, Baird PN. Association of the hepatocyte growth factor gene with keratoconus in an Australian population. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e84067.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Li X, Bykhovskaya Y, Haritunians T, Siscovick D, Aldave A, Szczotka-Flynn L, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies a potential novel gene locus for keratoconus, one of the commonest causes for corneal transplantation in developed countries. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(2):421–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Morris-Rosendahl DJ, Segel R, Born AP, Conrad C, Loeys B, Brooks SS, et al. New RAB3GAP1 mutations in patients with Warburg Micro Syndrome from different ethnic backgrounds and a possible founder effect in the Danish. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18(10):1100–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Aligianis IA, Johnson CA, Gissen P, Chen D, Hampshire D, Hoffmann K, et al. Mutations of the catalytic subunit of RAB3GAP cause Warburg Micro syndrome. Nat Genet. 2005;37(3):221–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Asahina M, Endoh Y, Matsubayashi T, Fukuda T, Ogata T. Novel RAB3GAP1 compound heterozygous mutations in Japanese siblings with Warburg Micro syndrome. Brain Dev. 2016;38(3):337–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Bae HA, Mills RA, Lindsay R, Phillips T, Coster D, Mitchell P, et al. Replication and meta-analysis of candidate loci identified variation at RAB3GAP1 associated with keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(7):5132–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Engler C, Chakravarti S, Doyle J, Eberhart CG, Meng H, Stark WJ, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta signaling pathway activation in Keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(5):752–9. e2.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Rabinowitz YS, Dong L, Wistow G. Gene expression profile studies of human keratoconus cornea for NEIBank: a novel cornea-expressed gene and the absence of transcripts for aquaporin 5. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(4):1239–46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Kannabiran C. Genetics of corneal endothelial dystrophies. J Genet. 2009;88(4):487–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Bustamante M, Tasinato A, Maurer F, Elkochairi I, Lepore MG, Arsenijevic Y, et al. Overexpression of a mutant form of TGFBI/BIGH3 induces retinal degeneration in transgenic mice. Mol Vis. 2008;14:1129–37.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Weiss JS, Møller HU, Aldave AJ, Seitz B, Bredrup C, Kivela T, et al. IC3D classification of corneal dystrophies--edition 2. Cornea. 2015;34(2):117–59.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Guan T, Liu C, Ma Z, Ding S. The point mutation and polymorphism in keratoconus candidate gene TGFBI in Chinese population. Gene. 2012;503(1):137–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Karolak JA, Polakowski P, Szaflik J, Szaflik JP, Gajecka M. Molecular Screening of Keratoconus Susceptibility Sequence Variants in VSX1, TGFBI, DOCK9, STK24, and IPO5 Genes in Polish Patients and Novel TGFBI Variant Identification. Ophthalmic Genet. 2016;37(1):37–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Suesskind D, Auw-Haedrich C, Schorderet DF, Munier FL, Loeffler KU. Keratoepithelin in secondary corneal amyloidosis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244(6):725–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Tai TY, Damani MR, Vo R, Rayner SA, Glasgow BJ, Hofbauer JD, et al. Keratoconus associated with corneal stromal amyloid deposition containing TGFBIp. Cornea. 2009;28(5):589–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Jurkunas UV, Bitar M, Rawe I. Colocalization of increased transforming growth factor-beta-induced protein (TGFBIp) and Clusterin in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(3):1129–36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Weller JM, Zenkel M, Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Bachmann BO, Tourtas T, Kruse FE. Extracellular matrix alterations in late-onset Fuchs’ corneal dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(6):3700–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Udar N, Kenney MC, Chalukya M, Anderson T, Morales L, Brown D, et al. Keratoconus--no association with the transforming growth factor beta-induced gene in a cohort of American patients. Cornea. 2004;23(1):13–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Abu A, Frydman M, Marek D, Pras E, Nir U, Reznik-Wolf H, et al. Deleterious mutations in the Zinc-Finger 469 gene cause brittle cornea syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;82(5):1217–22.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Lu Y, Vitart V, Burdon KP, Khor CC, Bykhovskaya Y, Mirshahi A, et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify multiple loci associated with central corneal thickness and keratoconus. Nat Genet. 2013;45(2):155–63.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Lu Y, Dimasi DP, Hysi PG, Hewitt AW, Burdon KP, Toh T, et al. Common genetic variants near the Brittle Cornea Syndrome locus ZNF469 influence the blinding disease risk factor central corneal thickness. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(5):e1000947.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Vithana EN, Aung T, Khor CC, Cornes BK, Tay WT, Sim X, et al. Collagen-related genes influence the glaucoma risk factor, central corneal thickness. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(4):649–58.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Davidson AE, Borasio E, Liskova P, Khan AO, Hassan H, Cheetham ME, et al. Brittle cornea syndrome ZNF469 mutation carrier phenotype and segregation analysis of rare ZNF469 variants in familial keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(1):578–86.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Vincent AL, Jordan CA, Cadzow MJ, Merriman TR, McGhee CN. Mutations in the zinc finger protein gene, ZNF469, contribute to the pathogenesis of keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(9):5629–35.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Lechner J, Porter LF, Rice A, Vitart V, Armstrong DJ, Schorderet DF, et al. Enrichment of pathogenic alleles in the brittle cornea gene, ZNF469, in keratoconus. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(20):5527–35.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Karolak JA, Gambin T, Rydzanicz M, Szaflik JP, Polakowski P, Frajdenberg A, et al. Evidence against ZNF469 being causative for keratoconus in Polish patients. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94(3):289–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Liskova P, Palos M, Hardcastle AJ, Vincent AL. Further genetic and clinical insights of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 3. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(10):1296–303.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Evans CJ, Liskova P, Dudakova L, Hrabcikova P, Horinek A, Jirsova K, et al. Identification of six novel mutations in ZEB1 and description of the associated phenotypes in patients with posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy 3. Ann Hum Genet. 2015;79(1):1–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Liskova P, Filipec M, Merjava S, Jirsova K, Tuft SJ. Variable ocular phenotypes of posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy caused by mutations in the ZEB1 gene. Ophthalmic Genet. 2010;31(4):230–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Lechner J, Dash DP, Muszynska D, Hosseini M, Segev F, George S, et al. Mutational spectrum of the ZEB1 gene in corneal dystrophies supports a genotype-phenotype correlation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(5):3215–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Raiskup F, Rizzo CL, Renieri A. First identification of a triple corneal dystrophy association: keratoconus, epithelial basement membrane corneal dystrophy and fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2014;5(3):281–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Semina EV, Mintz-Hittner HA, Murray JC. Isolation and characterization of a novel human paired-like homeodomain-containing transcription factor gene, VSX1, expressed in ocular tissues. Genomics. 2000;63(2):289–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Héon E, Greenberg A, Kopp KK, Rootman D, Vincent AL, Billingsley G, et al. VSX1: a gene for posterior polymorphous dystrophy and keratoconus. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11(9):1029–36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Bisceglia L, Ciaschetti M, De Bonis P, Campo PA, Pizzicoli C, Scala C, et al. VSX1 mutational analysis in a series of Italian patients affected by keratoconus: detection of a novel mutation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(1):39–45.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Saee-Rad S, Hashemi H, Miraftab M, Noori-Daloii MR, Chaleshtori MH, Raoofian R, et al. Mutation analysis of VSX1 and SOD1 in Iranian patients with keratoconus. Mol Vis. 2011;17:3128–36.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Jeoung JW, Kim MK, Park SS, Kim SY, Ko HS, Wee WR, et al. VSX1 gene and keratoconus: genetic analysis in Korean patients. Cornea. 2012;31(7):746–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Wang Y, Jin T, Zhang X, Wei W, Cui Y, Geng T, et al. Common single nucleotide polymorphisms and keratoconus in the Han Chinese population. Ophthalmic Genet. 2013;34(3):160–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Aldave AJ, Han J, Frausto RF. Genetics of the corneal endothelial dystrophies: an evidence-based review. Clin Genet. 2013;84(2):109–19.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Stabuc-Silih M, Strazisar M, Hawlina M, Glavac D. Absence of pathogenic mutations in VSX1 and SOD1 genes in patients with keratoconus. Cornea. 2010;29(2):172–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Aldave AJ, Yellore VS, Salem AK, Yoo GL, Rayner SA, Yang H, et al. No VSX1 gene mutations associated with keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(7):2820–2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Tang YG, Picornell Y, Su X, Li X, Yang H, Rabinowitz YS. Three VSX1 gene mutations, L159M, R166W, and H244R, are not associated with keratoconus. Cornea. 2008;27(2):189–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Liskova P, Ebenezer ND, Hysi PG, Gwilliam R, El-Ashry MF, Moodaley LC, et al. Molecular analysis of the VSX1 gene in familial keratoconus. Mol Vis. 2007;13:1887–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Tanwar M, Kumar M, Nayak B, Pathak D, Sharma N, Titiyal JS, et al. VSX1 gene analysis in keratoconus. Mol Vis. 2010;16:2395–401.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  98. Abu-Amero KK, Kalantan H, Al-Muammar AM. Analysis of the VSX1 gene in keratoconus patients from Saudi Arabia. Mol Vis. 2011;17:667–72.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  99. Moschos MM, Kokolakis N, Gazouli M, Chatziralli IP, Droutsas D, Anagnou NP, et al. Polymorphism Analysis of VSX1 and SOD1 Genes in Greek Patients with Keratoconus. Ophthalmic Genet. 2015;36(3):213–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Dash DP, George S, O’Prey D, Burns D, Nabili S, Donnelly U, et al. Mutational screening of VSX1 in keratoconus patients from the European population. Eye. 2010;24(6):1085–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Eran P, Almogit A, David Z, Wolf HR, Hana G, Yaniv B, et al. The D144E substitution in the VSX1 gene: a non-pathogenic variant or a disease causing mutation? Ophthalmic Genet. 2008;29(2):53–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Dimasi DP, Burdon KP, Craig JE. The genetics of central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(8):971–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Toh T, Liew SH, MacKinnon JR, Hewitt AW, Poulsen JL, Spector TD, et al. Central corneal thickness is highly heritable: the twin eye studies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(10):3718–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Colin J, Sale Y, Malet F, Cochener B. Inferior steepening is associated with thinning of the inferotemporal cornea. J Refract Surg. 1996;12(6):697–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Steele TM, Fabinyi DC, Couper TA, Loughnan MS. Prevalence of Orbscan II corneal abnormalities in relatives of patients with keratoconus. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2008;36(9):824–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Vitart V, Bencić G, Hayward C, Skunca Herman J, Huffman J, Campbell S, et al. New loci associated with central cornea thickness include COL5A1, AKAP13 and AVGR8. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(21):4304–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Cornes BK, Khor CC, Nongpiur ME, Xu L, Tay WT, Zheng Y, et al. Identification of four novel variants that influence central corneal thickness in multi-ethnic Asian populations. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(2):437–45.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Gao X, Gauderman WJ, Liu Y, Marjoram P, Torres M, Haritunians T, et al. A genome-wide association study of central corneal thickness in Latinos. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(4):2435–43.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Dimasi DP, Chen JY, Hewitt AW, Klebe S, Davey R, Stirling J, et al. Novel quantitative trait loci for central corneal thickness identified by candidate gene analysis of osteogenesis imperfecta genes. Hum Genet. 2010;127(1):33–44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Hoehn R, Zeller T, Verhoeven VJ, Grus F, Adler M, Wolfs RC, et al. Population-based meta-analysis in Caucasians confirms association with COL5A1 and ZNF469 but not COL8A2 with central corneal thickness. Hum Genet. 2012;131(11):1783–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Li X, Bykhovskaya Y, Canedo AL, Haritunians T, Siscovick D, Aldave AJ, et al. Genetic association of COL5A1 variants in keratoconus patients suggests a complex connection between corneal thinning and keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(4):2696–704.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Sahebjada S, Schache M, Richardson AJ, Snibson G, MacGregor S, Daniell M, et al. Evaluating the association between keratoconus and the corneal thickness genes in an independent Australian population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(13):8224–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Cuellar-Partida G, Springelkamp H, Lucas SE, Yazar S, Hewitt AW, Iglesias AI, et al. WNT10A exonic variant increases the risk of keratoconus by decreasing corneal thickness. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(17):5060–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Nakatsu MN, Ding Z, Ng MY, Truong TT, Yu F, Deng SX. Wnt/β-catenin signaling regulates proliferation of human cornea epithelial stem/progenitor cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(7):4734–41.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Udar N, Atilano SR, Brown DJ, Holguin B, Small K, Nesburn AB, et al. SOD1: a candidate gene for keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(8):3345–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Al-Muammar AM, Kalantan H, Azad TA, Sultan T, Abu-Amero KK. Analysis of the SOD1 Gene in Keratoconus Patients from Saudi Arabia. Ophthalmic Genet. 2015;36(4):373–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Kenney MC, Chwa M, Atilano SR, Tran A, Carballo M, Saghizadeh M, et al. Increased levels of catalase and cathepsin V/L2 but decreased TIMP-1 in keratoconus corneas: evidence that oxidative stress plays a role in this disorder. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(3):823–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Arnal E, Peris-Martinez C, Menezo JL, Johnsen-Soriano S, Romero FJ. Oxidative stress in keratoconus? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(12):8592–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Wang Y, Wei W, Zhang C, Zhang X, Liu M, Zhu X, et al. Association of Interleukin-1 Gene Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms with Keratoconus in Chinese Han Population. Curr Eye Res. 2016;41(5):630–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Kim SH, Mok JW, Kim HS, Joo CK. Association of -31 T > C and −511 C > T polymorphisms in the interleukin 1 beta (IL1B) promoter in Korean keratoconus patients. Mol Vis. 2008;14:2109–16.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  121. Mikami T, Meguro A, Teshigawara T, Takeuchi M, Uemoto R, Kawagoe T, et al. Interleukin 1 beta promoter polymorphism is associated with keratoconus in a Japanese population. Mol Vis. 2013;19:845–51.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  122. Palamar M, Onay H, Ozdemir TR, Arslan E, Egrilmez S, Ozkinay F, et al. Relationship between IL1beta-511C > T and ILRN VNTR polymorphisms and keratoconus. Cornea. 2014;33(2):145–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. Stabuc-Silih M, Ravnik-Glavac M, Glavac D, Hawlina M, Strazisar M. Polymorphisms in COL4A3 and COL4A4 genes associated with keratoconus. Mol Vis. 2009;15:2848–60.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  124. Saravani R, Hasanian-Langroudi F, Validad MH, Yari D, Bahari G, Faramarzi M, et al. Evaluation of possible relationship between COL4A4 gene polymorphisms and risk of keratoconus. Cornea. 2015;34(3):318–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. Abu-Amero KK, Helwa I, Al-Muammar A, Strickland S, Hauser MA, Allingham RR, et al. Case-control association between CCT-associated variants and keratoconus in a Saudi Arabian population. J Negat Results Biomed. 2015;14:10.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Kokolakis NS, Gazouli M, Chatziralli IP, Koutsandrea C, Gatzioufas Z, Peponis VG, et al. Polymorphism analysis of COL4A3 and COL4A4 genes in Greek patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmic Genet. 2014;35(4):226–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  127. Hughes AE, Bradley DT, Campbell M, Lechner J, Dash DP, Simpson DA, et al. Mutation altering the miR-184 seed region causes familial keratoconus with cataract. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;89(5):628–33.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Iliff BW, Riazuddin SA, Gottsch JD. A single-base substitution in the seed region of miR-184 causes EDICT syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(1):348–53.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Bykhovskaya Y, Caiado Canedo AL, Wright KW, Rabinowitz YS. C.57 C > T Mutation in MIR 184 is Responsible for Congenital Cataracts and Corneal Abnormalities in a Five-generation Family from Galicia, Spain. Ophthalmic Genet. 2015;36(3):244–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  130. Bykhovskaya Y, Seldin MF, Liu Y, Ransom M, Li X, Rabinowitz YS. Independent origin of c.57 C > T mutation in MIR184 associated with inherited corneal and lens abnormalities. Ophthalmic Genet. 2015;36(1):95–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Abu-Amero KK, Helwa I, Al-Muammar A, Strickland S, Hauser MA, Allingham RR, et al. Screening of the Seed Region of MIR184 in Keratoconus Patients from Saudi Arabia. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:604508.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Lechner J, Bae HA, Guduric-Fuchs J, Rice A, Govindarajan G, Siddiqui S, et al. Mutational analysis of MIR184 in sporadic keratoconus and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(8):5266–72.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Burdon KP, Vincent AL. Insights into keratoconus from a genetic perspective. Clin Exp Optom. 2013;96(2):146–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016